Clearing up the confusion of PCR testing and the comments made by the inventor of PCR Kary Mullis.
In the comment above made by Kary Mullis, he is saying that virus sphere molecules and their functions are simply hypothetical in nature, fakebelieve ideas created by "scientists" talking about them but never proving anything.
No matter how much they talk about virus molecules it does not make them real as they never provide evidence of their fakebelieve functionality.
It is obvious by now no one has actually worked with these hypothetical specimens, no one can work with their DNA/RNA or use PCR to characterise and find them. They are however able to artificially create fictional insilico virus organisms using computer software but not actually work with the real things because the real things do not actually exist.
If you still can't get it, let me explain it even more.
People are assuming that highly contagious deadly mutating pathogenic virus organisms exist because a name, group and classification was created for the specimens without ever really identifying them.
People say they worked on HIV so therefore HIV must exist and the public don't have a reason to not believe them as they are not "virologist".🤣🤣
Virologists also believe they are working with real virus organism specimens because the experiments are set up in a way that proper controls are not used and instead it's all assumed the virus organism is present when in reality it isn't.
All that's there is a poisoned/toxic cell culture which is actually what the term "virus" is supposed to mean so the virologists are purposely misleading themselves by using the wrong definition of the word virus. A lot of virologist do claim they really cannot separate the virus out of the cell so they acknowledge that the cell is the virus for the most part.
However all they are really studying is the breakdown of toxic dead and dying tissues usually by direct poisoning and or nutritional deficiencies which creates a "virus cell" aka "poisoned cell".
The other issue is that the virologists use molecular genome sequences in a way that artificially aligns and creates brand new computer generated genomes that were never fully there in whole form.
Then they start to recognize that each time they run the artificial sequence creation tools they produce whole long form nucleic acid sequences that are never exactly the same so they claim this is proof that the virus organism is mutating and changing into a new variant so they give that one a new name instead of realising it was never there to begin with. They never really found this virus organism variant, they created/generated it in silico which simply means in a computer.
Mullis has many times explained that the PCR can find or create any molecules you are looking for by running the cycles enough times this is the same false paradigm that is being used to find/create fakebelieve virus organisms.
Let's take the covid-19 sars-cov-2 PCR test for example back in early 2020 when I read how the PCR was being set up to "find" and diagnose people with positive virus infections is what made me realise there was nothing to worry about regarding SARS-cov-2. (Again you read the name so you think it exists 😂.)
When I read that the PCR tests were made to enable a test to be positive at 45 cycles I was shocked not only to that fact but to the fact that they also were set up with no negative control markers!
This means any covid-19 diagnostic test result should have been thrown in the garbage. There was no single PCR test for sars-cov-2 that had normal legitimate parameters.
Normally the PCR process has a negative control limit set to 25-30 cycles which means any positive markers at or above or around the negative marker would likely be a "false positive" and so if they found that sequence at those cycles it would mean whatever they are looking for is not really there.
Normally a positive marker would be set around 12-18 cycles so those sequences found at or below those amount of cycles means there is more of that something there and likely actually there and not created by the amplification process.
Just doing this once with one sample is also not conclusive so when it comes to PCR you would still need need to run repeats on the same sample to even get a good estimation. Repeats were not being done when people were given their diagnosis and the positive cycle thresholds were not provided to the patients or discussed with them.
Like I said above, these covid-19 tests were also specifically run without negative controls with the positive markers set at 40 cycles which really would mean all the test results were garbage.
Whoever was in charge of this trickery should be sent to prison for creating a false pandemic using a false test.
Anyone in this field understands this and so anyone who went along with this or influenced governments and the public to rely on this faulty test should also be held accountable.
What I find odd is even Dr Fauci explained this clearly to the public when he said that the majority of the covid-19 PCR tests results were simply showing false positive markers of dead nucleotides because he said that a result of 30 or 35 meant nothing is really there apart from dead nucleotides created by the process of amplification.
Yet the official tests being used were set to be positive up to 40 with no negative which meant you could test positive at 45 cycles and why people were testing positive at 35 cycles so if the doctor wanted to diagnose you of having covid-19 he or she could do that after your results came back positive at the 45 cycle column 🤣🤣🤣.
This was clearly a HOAX being played on the world population and the PCR test is 100% evidence of that!
If that still hasn't cleared things up please keep reading...
Not only was the PCR parameters all set up criminally but the people who set it up didnt have a virus sample so they created a mock sample and added some synthetic RNA using a sequence they downloaded from some chinese scientists public server 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤣.
Did you catch that? A fake sample was made without an"isolated virus specimen" and the real reason of this is that all virus organisms are fakebelieve and so any test for a virus organism is not possible and never will be possible.
Let me explain a little more.
I have this book I read from back in the day about Mullis and his PCR machine.
The people working with him pretty much hated him.
So the person who was tasked to find, isolate and characterise HIV was originally a bacteriologist that knew nothing about PCR. He believed because he was told that it was a tool to find viruses by finding specific sequences that were known to be part of the virus organism 🤣.
This whole time Mullis specifically said no one was able to prove that a virus was the cause of AIDS and he came to the conclusion that it wasn't possible to find virus organisms with the PCR and if his coworkers thought they could he explained how it would not be evidence of anything but they wanted to use it anyway for that reason.
Basically the whole concept of using PCR to find a virus was to spread misinformation about the use of PCR which was all about the need to trick the scientific community and clinical practices into buying them and using them to diagnose viral infections and gene abnormalities even though Mullis didn't design it for that.
He ended up leaving the company he worked for but that company still had rights to sell off the PCR machine and they desperately needed to make the company money after failing to get one of their drugs FDA approved.
Their plan was to market the PCR as a highly accurate diagnostic test so they could sell it off for millions to keep their business from going under, it worked like a charm!
After the scientific community accepted the PCR for this purpose Mullis was labelled as a "nut job" for trying to prevent it being used in this way mainly due to the fact that it meant he would not have made millions and also because he was going against the scientific community.
He wanted it to be used only in molecular and biochemical research departments and not for diagnosing clinical disease because he realised there was no evidence that the molecules found using PCR at high cycles make people sick because even when PCR is used properly it can and will find almost any molecules you want it to.
He didn't want his invention being used to misdiagnose people with a disease like HIV. He didn't feel comfortable lying to the general population and was fully aware that his invention was being used by pharmaceutical companies and government institutions to harm people by giving an artificial diagnosis and then poisonous drugs like AZT.
He was clearly convinced that AIDS was not from a random always mutating virus organism.
Anyway in the book the guy in charge of HIV isolation was constantly getting false positives and had no idea why lol, yet that was not too much of a concern and so the PCR was still pushed out the door as an effective virus identification tool because it was almost 100% effective at FINDING the virus. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Their mottos at the time must have been.
"If it's there, it must be there!
It is highly effective at finding the sequences to accurately diagnose people!"
Sounds just like the covid-19 PCR test issues with the high false positive rates. 🤫
At one stage during the HIV HOAX there were so many false positives that the clinical diagnosis was given only after people filled in a questionnaire.
Specifically, if the people answered yes to questions like are you highly sexually active, homosexual, go to nightclubs or ever taken drugs then you would get a HIV positive test result if the PCR test came back positive.
However if you answered no to those questions and your PCR test came back positive you would be classed as HIV negative.
Depending where you lived just answering yes to being black or hispanic could have gotten you a positive HIV test.
It was a massive successful government / big pharmaceutical campaign to push the new AIDS drugs and vaccines on people worldwide. It was simply a way to just make lots of money and cause mass hysteria at the same time which meant easy population control and was ultimately supported and funded by the world eugenics organisations like WHO.
