When one of the largest stake holders, @steem begins to care about the negative effects of individual using the 15 delegated steem to do nothing but down vote then perhaps people in the smaller ranks will take notice and join the effort to try and negate some of the bad behavior on the Steem block Chain. Right now why should any small account that can be sent to a zero reputation participate in trying to clean the Steem Block Chain when the largest delegate refuses to take action against any of these what larger accounts call ankle biters accounts?

The EIP was a valuable piece of work, unfortunately @steem account does not (apparently) believe in the process, if so they would remove the delegations from all the accounts that have a history of doing nothing on the steem block chain other than their initial post and then 10 days later starting to do random down votes primarily to smaller accounts. That is why I will not be doing any down voting. When the situation changes, then maybe my attitude will change with the situation.