If you don't believe in climate change

I find it really sweet and amusing that a person who obviously has no scientific experience, and who obviously didn't even bother to read what I wrote in my comment, comes to conclusion that I, a PhD scientist, don't believe in climate change and even gives me a suggestion on how to educate myself properly on the topic :)

But never mind, I have already stated in couple of comments that I'm not falling for scare-mongering, and for the fear of “reductio ad Hitlerium” :)

However, more than of curiosity than of the respect for the author of the comment, I actually went and checked out the video of the mentioned journalist (not scientist) Potholer, named How accurate are scientific predictions about climate?, in hope I would really find real scientific papers cited, but instead I found nothing but links to certain websites and to mainstream media news.

Since @raycoms said:

I read a bunch of papers against global warming today and did my homework.

I assume that you read bunch of papers backing up the claims of your prophet Greta as well, so would really like to kindly ask you to provide me with links to the peer-reviewed scientific papers (not links to websites, and certainly not links to Youtube videos) stating/proving the following things:

1. Climate change is man-made, and to what percent;

2. How much will the average global temperature rise, if we continue burning fossil fuels in the way we do now, and for how much time we can expect that to happen;

3. What sorts of consequences will man-kind face (in details) and why, if the temperature rises for insert the number from the paper cited in 2 degrees;

4. What are the CO2 emissions per capita by the country (USA, China, India...) currently, and what sort of trend do those emissions exhibit during the past say, 50 years for each country;

5. What kind of lifestyle changes should people adopt, to what extent, in which countries, what would be the cost of those changes (strictly economically speaking) and how exactly countries plan to pay for it;

6. If countries from 5 manage to achieve Utopian, best case scenario, in which countries from 5 manage to decrease CO2 emissions by the planned amount, what would be the actual influence on the global temperature cited in 2?

Only when you and/or other people who think exactly like you that they know everything they should know about the man made climate change, provide answers to all these questions, only then you can consider that you know what you're talking about, and only then, you can have a normal, rational, science-based discussion with me.