Garbage.

p.s. I gave him the delegation because he's active in the chat and has the potential to be a positive influence on the platform. I don't give a flying fuck about anyone's political opinion, as long as

Final word, You weren't even willing to explain what's going on You didn't ask, you said 'bb schrosct' when I said I was leaving. I'm not bluffing, closing my account, so don't waste time fending off your

Too bad your thesis isn't like your posts where it's all about who you know, huh?

Not flagging you to stop the delegation, Flagging you because you're the worst fraud here. Worse than a flat-earther.

Funny, I said the same about you ages ago. He says nothing for me to argue against. Yet you won't shut up about it...

Yeah, because 3 people can't be wrong.

If it confuses you, it's not @davidpakman's fault.

@prlndra this is spam at this point.

I would like to apologize for the upvotes that @prlndra is spreading. He is using @suesa's delegation to upvote ignorance and anti-intellectualism. I'm mostly ashamed of @suesa's decision to give him power

What debate are you fostering? I see inane comments being upvoted by you.

Disagreement with rewards. I feel that @prlndra is upvoting easily dismissable things which I can't even tell if they watched the entire video based on their content.

So can you name even one idea that you would be willing to defend? I think it's completely fair that if someone is pretending that old, easily dismissable ideas are intellectually provocative then it's

Important note that the video isn't to dismiss whatever bad idea you think was attacked but to wonder why you fell for it in the first place.

The video was to dive into the question of why people fall for fake intellectualism, did he not raise these questions and try to give an answer? If you thought the video was to dismiss each pseudo intellectual

@prlndra you're also upvoting a lot of garbage in here. :|

So which point do you disagree with? I guarantee that any one that you come up with I can provide a video where @davidpakman has already gone into great length on his opinion of the topic. For example,

I'm looking for is an interesting discourse that will stimulate ideas. Then do you understand that the video is trying to explain that you're being tricked?

So which idea did you think needed deeper discussion? He probably already has a video about it.

He didn't coin the phrase intellectual dark web. He's responding to someone that wrote an opinion piece for the NY Times,