How can POB stand out just like Hive stands out from Steem?

There's some hard answers with this question. First, I'll write that I'm not sure POB should stand out from Steem right now. It's too new. Development is still in progress. On the management side, we need to further build the platform.

• Investment Protection:

  • Rewards: People, or a solid algorithm, needs to reduce the burden from self-regulating content. @Onealfa appears to do the bulk of his regulation on the rewards side of the house. For the most part, his behaviors are pretty consistent. I remember one of the first posts I read of his. You could build an SQL off of that post. Hell, it changed how I curated. The problem though, is that I feel like it's only him on the POB side. One person can't do it alone. Also, he leans on the side of justifying his DV actions and that is ALWAYS a good thing.
  • Plagiarism et al.: I'll do this for a good part of my online time. Sometimes I find none. Other times I'll spend my VP downvoting. Like 1A, I'll justify my voting. I'm looking at starting rewards checks soon. Of course, justifications are still required here.

• Use Cases: We need solid application of use cases we can apply POB towards. There's an updated listing of proposals since March I'm looking at updating. I'm not sure when I'll be done.

• POB-Ecency: To stand apart, @leprechaun felt POB needed a new home. He requested, and then gained funding to develop the current proofofbrain.blog. It's solid work that is getting refined.

• Advertising: We need people to speak the phrase "proof of brain" and for it to catch on.

There's a ton more, but I've been up for quite some time.