I am, but I haven't posted in a while. A long while, actually. And SCR seems to be going by the way of the STEEM by the looks of things. Though I dunno, I may throw some money at it, just as speculation.

These people didn't actually make any money, though. Those votes are paid for, meaning they made no actual profit. But yeah, I think bid bot business hurt STEEM more than people are willing to admit. There's

No. And even if there was, STEEM would not be a part of it. Sorry. It had its chance, but it has since passed. And it's not even entirely INC's fault, it's the stakeholders.

I haven't voted almost at all myself for quite a while now, probably a year or so. I just comment if I have something to say. You pretty much need several millions of STEEM Power to have a meaningful vote

But I like get rich quick schemes. Steemit was more fun when people made money tbh.

Yeah, I cared.

lol.

Funny thing about the FCAS score - it's literally something a number of dying alt projects have pointed to: "But look at our FCAS score!" I see it as a bad sign, moreso than anything else. It's

It's literally miles behind Dogecoin, a literal jokecoin. Altcoin projects die all the time. I don't see any reason for STEEM to get a rational pump. All we can hope for is an irrational pump. There's

I'm just reminding that it's entirely possible that STEEM is just dead. It had its run.

I haven't dumped any STEEM in, I think, over a year, and have been powering up the little rewards I've gotten - but there is something to be said about bagholding. And it should be kept in mind. That said,

I'd want STEEM to be worth $100, but unfortunately it's not up to me. STEEM is currently sitting firmly in shitcoin status itself at below 70 at CMC. I've only powered up and not dumped anything in probably

Steemit is just as dead.

Now just get rid of delegation. It has zero positive impact. 50/50, rewards curve, and removing delegation could make this place worthwhile to use again. Maybe. But with delegation and the bid bots still

When I joined in 2016, I was under the illusion that capitalism and free market principles would cause Steemit to self moderate itself to success, seeing as how large stakeholders would have a clear financial

Yea, so the only reason to buy STEEM is speculation - and in terms of being an attractive speculative buy, STEEM has to compete with every other token out there, currently about 71 of them being more

Yeah, that is true. Most of this is just manipulation. But I think it's partially because crypto still offers zero to normal people, really. So there's not a very large market outside of the big whale

In order for STEEM's price to go up to $4, people need a reason to buy STEEM now. And if there are no reasons, it can't go up to $4. Of course "Maybe it'll go to $4" is kind of a reason. But

Nah. I'd say that people who move on from this place, good for them.

Yeah, to blame the problems of Steemit/STEEM on the "little guys" who have practically zero power or say over anything, is just hilarious. When rich guys exploit systems, people say it's just