Login
Discover
Waves
Communities
Raidstead
Write
Login
Signup
schachoberhessen
@schachoberhessen
54
Followers
53
Following
63
Follow
Email digest
Resource Credits
Available
Used
Created
2018-12-04 22:07
RSS Feed
Subscribe
Comments
Blog
Posts
Comments
Communities
Wallet
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
Thank you for your oppinion. You understand that 10% is for me absolutely fine if taken from the voting SPS but when it is taken from the staked SPS it would be (with the last passed proposal) 33,6% so
$ 0.030
2
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Restrict Gladiator Cards Below Silver League
I agree that Gladiator should NEVER added to ranked play at ALL and it was promised when they come out that will be only playable in brawls, however I am strictly against THIS proposal because it doesn't
$ 0.028
2
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Restrict Gladiator Cards Below Silver League
Yes Ouora can be countered, for example also from the Goblin Psychic with Affliction - Unfornately the Goblin Psychic get Affliction only at Level 4 and so this counter doesn't work in bronze league. How
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Restrict Gladiator Cards Below Silver League
In general I agree, but: "Players will farm more useless cards. Will you play a 6 mana cost summoner with no abilities? (soulbound so it cannot be traded or sold)" Here you oversee somthing -
schachoberhessen
splinterlands
3y
RE: Splinterlands - DAO-Proposal: Brawl - Count all frays equally:
Thank you !
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
"The burden of proof for a Community Proposal will be higher than normal proposals and require at least 10% of staked SPS voting in favor and having at least 2/3rds positive sentiment to advance to
schachoberhessen
HiveDevs
3y
RE: "Why am I being downvoted by @hive-defender and its trail?? 😡 😠 🤬"
Hello, I think yes. Thank you !
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Update Tournament Formatting and Reward Allocations
why did the price of all cards fall so much? Cause without Alpha-tournaments you have no usecase for this cards anymore, so Alpha-Card drop a lot in price. Cause without access to modern tournaments you
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Restrict Gladiator Cards Below Silver League
IMO the better way would be to add Gladiator-Cards to the Untamed-Set. In this case they wouldn't be playable in modern and the Ruleset "Are You Not Entertained?" can still be active as in modern
schachoberhessen
HiveDevs
3y
RE: "Why am I being downvoted by @hive-defender and its trail?? 😡 😠 🤬"
Thank you. I hope so. You see that even my comment above was downvoted even if he has no upvotes at all.
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
Before we run this proposal it was discussed nearly a month, first in discord and than in this post: Than it run one week as preprosal, visible for everybody who want see it at Peakmonsters and Splex and
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
"Why didn't you mention out T2 results? Playing in T3 we got the LOWEST merits relative to our T2 brawls. The SPS was comparable but certainly not the highest." Exactly this we want change buy
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
No I am not part of the "German contingent" I play in Peakmonsters Premiere. So if you see it from this point of view I cut my own rewards cause we normally reach a top-spot in Tier 4, last brawl
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
I have not put it together, I have submitted both separetly. @Clayboyn was first handle it in one thread but I tould that it is not neccessary connected - you can check all and read back in discord.
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
In every case it stay the option to suggest to sell a new tranche of DEC-B
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
You have a point: " Unless those guilds that dont fill in frays automatically count as losses and those losses add to the reward pool " I agree with you and this is definitely planned to run
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
Maybe you can suggest in discord to reduce the cost for upgrade in building or at least to sell a new tranche of dec-b to a reduced price (last was 20% discount) so that it will be cheaper in this way.
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
Maybe you can suggest in discord to reduce the cost for upgrade in building or at least to sell a new tranche of dec-b to a reduced price (last was 20% discount) so that it will be cheaper in this way.
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
One moment my friend, maybe you missunderstand one point - the Top-3-bonus won't be taken completely away, he will (when the proposal is successfull) only removed for Crowns and Merrits but he should stay
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
Maybe you can then see it as a (small) sacrifice for the entire ecosystem, because the guilds in places 4-10 will receive higher rewards in the future if the proposal is successful, so nothing is lost,
← Latest
Older →