Login
Discover
Waves
Communities
Login
Signup
schachoberhessen
@schachoberhessen
54
Followers
53
Following
63
Follow
Resource Credits
Available
Used
Created
2018-12-04 22:07
RSS Feed
Subscribe
Comments
Blog
Posts
Comments
Communities
Wallet
schachoberhessen
Deutsch D-A-CH
2026-06-12 15:16
RE: Letzes Update vor dem WM-Start
Vielen lieben Dank ! Finde ich super ! Fast hätte ich einen perfekten Start ins Tippspiel ... das 2:0 der Mexikaner hatte ich ja exakt getroffen aber bei Tschechien gegen Südkorea ein 1:1 getippt, naja
$ 0.000
0
schachoberhessen
splinterlands
2026-06-10 21:07
RE: Visions of Verico: Bloodlines Are Coming to Land
Isn't there a 3-day-cooldown period ? So you should atleast consider this as negative point when thinking to unstake and stake again.
$ 0.000
0
schachoberhessen
splinterlands
2026-06-07 23:32
RE: 📢 Announcement: Splinterlands Survival Mode Stress Testing Next Season
"Multi-accounting, win trading, botting, or any form of exploitation will result in disqualification." So every player can only add one Account to bracket 4 (if he want to be eligable) but can
schachoberhessen
Splinterlands
2026-06-03 19:34
RE: Spl-Stats: SPS DAO Proposal for Official Market Status
So what you are asking for is that you are eligable for market fees for your rental market ?
schachoberhessen
Splinterlands
2026-05-22 17:18
RE: MonsterCards.store will operate only until the end of May 2026
Thank you for your effort into this project. I will think if I try your new game out. Is there a free-to-play version or you need in every case to invest when you want start ?
schachoberhessen
gaza
2025-11-08 19:20
RE: The True Cost of Reconstructing Gaza - Part 1
Hello ! I hope I am write by you. I got your name from @PALASATENEA. I have a problem with splinterlands inc and maybe I need a lawyer, so would be nice if we can get in touch. Have you discord ? If yes
schachoberhessen
deutsch
2025-11-05 06:49
RE: Splinterlands: Kommt jetzt die Diktatur - Mein Account wurde von Splinterlands vom Voting für Proposal ausgeschlossen
Bisher nicht, Splinterlands stellt sich auf den Standpunkt, dass ICH beweisen muss das ich NICHT mit Bot gespielt haben und sie müssen nichts beweisen Das ist was der COO von Splinterlands mir geschrieben
schachoberhessen
deutsch
2025-11-04 09:12
RE: Splinterlands: Kommt jetzt die Diktatur - Mein Account wurde von Splinterlands vom Voting für Proposal ausgeschlossen
Doch ich habe ein Ticket aufgemacht und das hier als Antwort bekommen: After reviewing your case, we’ve identified a pattern of automation activity in the Frontier Modern mode that goes against Splinterlands’
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
2024-02-08 16:37
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Tournament Formats Option C
I disagree, I think that my argument does make a lot of sense. I just can repeat what I wrote in this comment (and you maybe don't read): "Unfornately Splinterlands has left this goal behind startung
schachoberhessen
splinterlands
2024-02-08 16:29
RE: SPS Governance Proposal: Brawl - Count all frays equally with examples about effects (tier 1-4)
The question is what is a penalty - You will with this change in every case loose not even one point but can win a lot of points, so I think it is no penalty. The other question is how it is in other
schachoberhessen
splinterlands
2024-02-08 16:22
RE: SPS Governance Proposal: Brawl - Count all frays equally with examples about effects (tier 1-4)
"If a guild doesnt have a member that can fill those frays, then they need to recruit to fill it." Or rent cards for this frays in the rental market.
schachoberhessen
splinterlands
2024-02-08 16:21
RE: SPS Governance Proposal: Brawl - Count all frays equally with examples about effects (tier 1-4)
First, as far as I know there isn't an Alpha/Beta-Fray anymore - I think he was changed to Alpha/Beta/Untamed what should IMO help a lot as you can play it now with cards from the Untamed Set. Second,
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
2024-02-06 23:51
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Tournament Formats Option C
If they would keep what they told when releasing Untamed all would be fine: Unfornately Splinterlands has left this goal behind startung with submitting the legandary Untamed Summoner so that now nobody
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
2024-01-10 21:58
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
Yes, I don't like the game "who is the winner and who is the loser" and as you can see we are all losers now when it comes to tournaments because some people really wanted to come out as winners
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
2024-01-10 05:04
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
I would definitely agree with this as it would be much less than the requirement of the proposal, tbh I have not checked the last 10 proposals but from the last successfzll proposal (to the time I wrote
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
2024-01-06 07:02
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
Yes I completely agree with you, about the noise in discord. But IMO this can be managed, I mention some possible solutions where one would be the slow mode. How it runs in the moment that a lot of people
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
2024-01-04 20:26
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
When I see that in the last finished proposal 221.210.628 staked SPS took part what is less than 30% of the totally staked-SPS from (744,252,423) than this 10% means 33,6% of the voting staked SPS. We
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
2024-01-04 20:23
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
Everybody - also you - can burn DEC from his own wallet and submit a proposal directly without the DAO.
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
2024-01-04 20:21
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Restrict Gladiator Cards Below Silver League
In the end it is not conrolled cause 66.67% from the staked SPS is really a lot, but when you consider that normally only 30%-40% of the staked SPS really vote and that not need "only" 33,34%
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
2024-01-04 20:18
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
For me the question is not who win and who loose but maybe we can find an acceptable compromise and have no looser but we are maybe two winner ... would this be possible or at least imaginable ?
Older →
