Login
Discover
Waves
Communities
Raidstead
Write
Login
Signup
schachoberhessen
@schachoberhessen
54
Followers
53
Following
63
Follow
Email digest
Resource Credits
Available
Used
Created
2018-12-04 22:07
RSS Feed
Subscribe
Comments
Blog
Posts
Comments
Communities
Wallet
schachoberhessen
sps
3y
RE: Soulbound Rewards: My Compromise Solution
I am not sure that they was even thinking about this. When they was calculating with this why they have not planned something but let the things just run ?
$ 0.043
4
schachoberhessen
sps
3y
RE: Soulbound Rewards: My Compromise Solution
Yes this is exactly the point ! If somebody has maxed out a regular-foil-common card he has burned 399 cards and reduced the supply of cards by 99,75% - Why he should get punished for this by beeing annoyed
$ 0.042
4
schachoberhessen
sps
3y
RE: Soulbound Rewards: My Compromise Solution
Yes it really sucks and I don't understand why Splinterlands don't solve this problem. I done this suggestion already but in general you can write where you want, in their suggestion site, in discord,
schachoberhessen
Splinterlands
3y
RE: Let's Fix The Brawl System - Take 2
Sounds very good, I will support it. About the Arena-Level as far as I understand it has influence on the whole pot of a brawl and not your personal earnings (or only indirect in a very small way) - cause
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
For me this is not crucial; I would agree to the proposal in both cases.
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
Difference will be even more as only player who take at least one point will contribute crowns to the pot, so in a brawl with 2 guilds 50% of the player hasn't take a point and will not contribute to the
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
Sorry I think that you missunderstand. As far as I understand the reward reduction is ONLY active for SPS. I think that crowns and merrits aren't affected from the reward reduction. Maybe @crytomancer
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Brawl Rewards
Sorry but you should read the context, the answer from @cryptomancer was a reply of this question: So he told that this change what we want implement with this proposal can be done quick but the topic
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Rework Leaderboard Rewards
Thank you for your comment, it is a good suggestion. However before put additional reward cards to chest it should first solve the problem that this reward cards are for more and more player useless, cause
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Rework Leaderboard Rewards
But it is a ridicoulos amount if you compare it with the pre-sale. So what was paied for the packs who are sold in pre-sale would be enough for nearly 10 years of leaderboard-prices. Okay than take only
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Rework Leaderboard Rewards
Sorry but I don't understand this point. So a player in champion can get matched only against another player in champion, so maybe a player with 4400 get matched against a player with 3500 (who was shortly
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Rework Leaderboard Rewards
Have you thought about the amount of DEC-Inflation. If everybody used max-voucher-amount and I really calculate only the sold (not the bonus) packs I come to the result that alone in the 30 days of Pre-Sale
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Rework Leaderboard Rewards
One first step would be to take away the 72-hours-league-limitation. To be honest I don't understand why in the last 72 hours of a season a player in diamond cannot be matched with a player in champion
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Rework Leaderboard Rewards
I agree with you, I pointed out already in discord and also here that the saved DECs for 10 years in leaderboard-prices are roughly equal to the DECs payed for the Rebellion-packs in 30 days Pre-Sale.
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Rework Leaderboard Rewards
Okay we will see what bring the future. Also when 15 million DEC a month = 180 million DEC a year sounds much it is not much compared with the Rebellion-Presale: In the Rebellion-Presale got 441,819 Packs
schachoberhessen
splinterlands
3y
RE: Splinterlands - DAO-Proposal: Remove the Reward Reducting for brawl-tiers with less than 10 guilds participating AND remove the bonus for the top 3 guilds in a brawl.
yes, so let's see if the stakeholder will like it, but I am optimistic. Thanks for working together on a solution for all.
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Rework Leaderboard Rewards
I agree with you that we should look if we can find a better way of leaderboard. But I disagree that this is a reasonable change. The amount of DECs printed for the leaderboard is so small that it doesn't
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Rework Leaderboard Rewards
Good suggestion. Just one question: Who will do this research and decide what card will be nerfed in what way ? You will do this in the future ?
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
3y
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Rework Leaderboard Rewards
Why we need this ? The DEC-price is too low ? In the townhall today was the question about change the leaderboard-prices - Answer: They don't see the leaderboard-Prices as a Problem. I also think so, let's
schachoberhessen
splinterlands
6y
RE: #17 Splinterlands Giveaway / Upvote Contest - Spinterlands Geschenk und Upvote-Wettbewerb: - Today a High Pries Darius / Heute ein High Priest Darius !!!
I got only this as reply:
← Latest
Older →