Today I feel that I can write and say that I think the Covid-19 vaccination narrative is finally starting to break down. On Sunday on a visit to the in-laws I learnt that my husband’s cousin, an otherwise healthy woman in her early fifties, has had a mild heart attack. After running numerous tests the cardiologist diagnosed she was suffering from Myocarditis. The interesting thing, however, is that the cardiologist was most interested in her Covid-19 vaccination history.
It is, unfortunately, through the experiences of our loved ones that people are waking up to the health dangers posed by these vaccinations. Take, for example, Dr Aseem Malhotra whose father was once the head of the British Medical Association and who is a trained cardiologist. When his father died he was able to interpret the autopsy findings to conclude that the heart attack that killed his dad was the result of the vaccinations.
An excellent interview if you have the time
Back in May the Director of the British Heart Foundation (BHF) said there had been an astonishing rise in the incidence of the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). Furthermore, in a move that angered vaxx proponents, they refused to rule out that there was no link to the vaccine.
In an article from the BHF in June of this year they stated that there had been 100,000 more deaths involving heart conditions in England since the start of the pandemic. When this data is added to cerebral vascular disease the numbers of excess deaths from heart conditions is the highest single contributor (at this point in time) to the excess mortality figures. The figures are based on official statistics as issued by government health bodies.
Since the beginning of the pandemic there has been, on average, over 500 additional deaths a week from cardiovascular disease. Despite Covid deaths falling, heart deaths have remained high. The BHF is calling this a disease crisis. Currently in England there are 390,000 people waiting for time-sensitive cardiac care. Plus average waiting times for ambulances (for heart attacks and strokes) has increased to over 30 minutes. It breached 90 minutes in December 2022. Additionally, even getting to see your GP has become increasingly difficult.
However, whilst the BHF is able to concede that Covid no longer explains the significant numbers of excess deaths they are unwilling (unable?) to even look into the possibility that the excess is being driven by the “vaccination” programme.
What effect on this message would admitting the very real vaccination risks have?
However, as far back as June 2021 there were reports circulating that Health Chiefs would issue warnings that the Pfizer and Moderna jabs were linked to heart conditions. Which, of course, the media was keen to describe as rare.
American regulators have already accepted there is a 'likely link' between the heart condition and the vaccines, and will add warnings about the potential complication on information sheets given to the public.
This followed the acceptance that AstraZeneca and the Johnson&Johnson jabs had been linked to blood clots. Again the media emphasised how rare these were. All acting to encourage people to get the shots, and indeed to push the “vaccines” on children who had an extremely low risk of being ill from Covid.
Vaccine booster add clearly aimed at targeting children
Looking at recent data from Denmark and Korea in relation to heart disease we can see that many cases are not as mild as they tell us. In fact the data tells us that 19.8% of cases of Myocarditis were actually severe (from a Korean nationwide survey of 44 million people). Indeed the assertion that Myocarditis is mild in of itself is questionable. How does it impact a young man’s life as he grows older for example?
The survey also revealed that the incidence was much higher in men (1.35 per 100,00) then in women (0.82 per 100,000). Ordinarily this would be described as rare, but can that be applied when 44 million doses are being administered? Other products are recalled for much, much less. The survey also revealed that the incidence amongst young men aged 12-17 was significantly higher at 5.29 per 100,000. Yet despite knowing the risk of Myocarditis, especially for young men, our health bodies are still recommending people to get the shots. Furthermore, this survey only confirms what has been known for some time about the risks of heart problems.
Most of these reactions are caused after the first or second dose. It is also important to recognise that many people are not regarded as being fully vaccinated until several weeks after their second dose. Leaving some people diagnosed with a heart problem after their first dose that are not considered to be vaccinated.
Similarly a survey in Denmark discovered a link between Myocarditis and the “vaccines”. Pfizer shot (BNT162b2) resulted in 1.4 cases per 100,000 vaccinated individuals, whilst the Moderna (mRNA) was 4.2 cases per 100,000 all within 28 days of vaccination.
The Korean survey revealed 19.8% of the total of these cases were severe. 7.5% were extremely serious and a further 4.4% required extracorporeal oxygenation. 4.4% (21 people) led to death, of which 8 were sudden cardiac arrest. These were attributed to the “vaccine” through the autopsy. All 8 were under the age of 45.
BBC story confirming Covid risk to children is minute
In July a trial in Switzerland by the Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute in Basel followed up a group that had had the Moderna booster (mRNA-1273). It consisted of 777 working people and 777 controls – the majority of which were hospital/healthcare workers. Mostly women, with a median age of 37.
The study found that 5.1% of those who had the booster had increased troponins indicating cardiomycocyte damage three days after having the booster. In other words chemical markers were found in their blood revealing cardiac damage. 2.8% (1 in 35) had vaccine-associated myocardial injury. The elevations were significantly higher then in the control group with a p<0.001 meaning only one chance in a thousand that this difference could have arisen by chance.
Question. If you were given the Moderna booster and you were not informed about this risk of myocarditis, does it still qualify as informed consent?
Is not providing people with informed consent actually a crime?
The people found to have the damage were advised to rest and not carry out any exercise. There being a chance it would just get better by itself, but they were warned the exercise might increase their chances of having ventricular fibrillation leading to a full cardiac arrest. There were no serious events as outcomes, but the patients had been warned not to strain themselves or exercise.
From Davidson’s Principles and Practice of Medicine (a standard textbook);
In most patients the disease [Myocarditis] is self-limiting and the immediate prognosis is excellent however death may occur due to ventricular arrhythmia or rapid progressive heart failure. Myocarditis has been reported as a cause of sudden and unexpected death in young athletes.
Those of you who are informed will recall the large numbers of young athletes falling down dead or having heart attacks whilst engaged in physical activity in 2021 and 2022. In England the ex-international footballer Matt Le Tissier has been trying to bring this to light and was sacked from several jobs for his efforts. Consider how in the last three years the number of unexpected deaths of celebrities we have heard about. Many at ages we wouldn’t expect to be falling dead unexpectedly. How “died unexpectedly” became one of the most searched topics on Google.
[Site unreachable]
The Swiss study revealed that anti-viral cytokines (part of a viral infection proinflammatory response) and the bodies agents against them, were found to be lower in the patients that developed markers of cardiac damage. Whether this was as a result of vaccine damage – or part of the reason why these people were so affected – is now being investigated.
Just last week the Australian Senate held a hearing into Pfizer, where the Pfizer doctors gave very unsatisfying answers to the various questions posed to them. Senator Gerard Rennick pointed out the lack of testing of various safety aspects of the “vaccine” and why it wasn’t highlighted to people. According to Pfizer’s own report there was no carcinogenic tests, no genotoxicity tests, no immunotoxicity tests, no iteration studies, no interaction studies with other medicines and no longitudinal studies. All of which must raise doubts over the claim that the “vaccine” was safe??
He then asked specifically about Myocarditis and asked the doctors about the mechanism that causes the “vaccine” to cause this disease. The doctors deflected the question at every turn. Again the doctors repeat the line that it’s mild – and also that it’s temporary. Still despite repeated clarification, they failed to answer the question – what is the biochemical mechanism by which the “vaccine” causes Myocarditis (and Pericarditis)?
For those of you into the science I will put forward Dr John Campbell’s explanation of the mechanism. Lipid nanoparticles carrying the ribonucleic acid are injected into the arm and we know that systemic distribution of these nanoparticles occurs (they go all round the body). So they must go though the blood vessels in the myocardium, through the coronary arteries, through the coronary capillaries and be drained by the coronary venules. The vessels in the heart are lined by a vascular endothelium and Dr John asserts that there is no reason why the nonoparticles won’t join up with these cell membranes, with the RNA going into those cells. The RNA then hijacks the cells protein producing apparatus causing the cells to excrete this foreign synthesised spike protein onto the cell’s surface. So now you have cells inside the coronary arteries with a foreign spike protein sitting on the surface of it. As a result it will trigger the bodies inflammatory immune response. Thereby causing inflammation in the heart.
Due to the systemic nature of this mechanism (ie going all round the body) this applies to other parts of the body too. The problems we are seeing in relation to the heart stem from two main factors: problems with the heart become apparent relatively quickly (such as Sudden Cardiac Arrest); and the standard measurement of troponins is a long standing tool used to diagnose heart problems. Yet these problems are likely to be occurring in other parts of the body that won’t show up so quickly and we are not testing for them for one reason or another. Take, for example the Pancreas. It will keep soldiering on until it just gives up and there will have been no outward symptoms of pancreatic failure.
Another explanation comes from Dr Paul Offit. He conjectures that the bodies response to the Spike protein inadvertently causes a particular type of antibody to be produced that also targets and attacks the heart muscle cells. Dr John reasons this could be possible. He then goes on to suggest that both mechanisms could be at work.
Image selling the vaccines as "safe"
Now you can believe that because they rushed this “vaccine” out it is understandable that they didn’t do all the usual safety checks. However, now it has been proven that there is a link between the “vaccines” and heart problems they should at the very least educate the public about the risks. Isn’t this the essence of informed consent. That they continue to recommend it, especially to children and young adults, when other products are recalled from market for far far less, should make you start questioning the real motives behind this roll out.
The pandemic is over, why are they still pushing the vaccine? Money? To save face? Because they were always designed from the beginning to cause harm? As part of a plan to create a digital surveillance state where we are all vaxxed, chipped and governed by social credit scores?
The answer may be all of the above.
There has now been a lot of research into the link between the vaccine and myocarditis. I’ve just focused on the most recent. Should we consider one in 35 as rare? Should we take into account that it has affected young people, especially young men. Is an extra 500 people dying a week in England to be notable? The people from Pfizer and Moderna would have you believe not – but I’m sure it’s absolutely nothing to do with persuading you to continue to get their jabs.
Some people can't remember that they said if you took the vaccine you wouldn't get Covid. Nor that they then said you wouldn't spread it to others. Both of these turned out to be untrue. Misinformation in fact. They claimed side effects were rare and mild - but more and more people are learning the hard way that that wasn't true either. Heart problems are easy to diagnose, but many people have just been left feeling less well. They were called heroes for taking the "vaccine" - so who wants to acknowledge they were actually taken in by a sophisticated advertising campaign?
What can you do about it? Well that's easy - just don't get any more jabs!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9725051/UK-health-chiefs-say-rates-myocarditis-higher-expected-amoung-young-adults.html
https://www.bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/news-from-the-bhf/news-archive/2023/june/100000-excess-deaths-cardiovascular-disease
