We live in a crazy, sometimes depressing world. Sometimes you wake up to good news, like freedom for Assange. Other days it is to learn about a new atrocity taking place in Gaza.
The solution? Well the antidote to depression, you see, is opposite action. Doing something about the matters that concern you is the road to good mental health and connection to the community.
Intimately connected to this is are the freedoms to speech and to congregate.
So speaking of action a recent international petition has been launched – available here.
The posing body appears somewhat problematic – Epistemology of Life and Ontology of Existence Foundation and Institute. It seems to be very comfortable with visions of globalism and trans-humanism.
Nonetheless, despite the source, we should look at the wording of the petition and sign it if you agree.
The petition calls for
This new technology was granted emergency use authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists. Going forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren’t resulting in net harm. Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution.
There must be a full exploration of mechanisms of harm to provide insight into their impact on the human body, both short and long term. Effectiveness must be reassessed through a comprehensive review of actual clinical impact on illness and mortality, as opposed to synthetic results based on modelled assumptions.
The denial of vaccine injury is a betrayal of those who followed official directives, often under coercion from mandates restricting their access to work, education, travel, hospitality and sports.
Fundamental and cherished principles of medical ethics were disregarded on the premise of an emergency. These included: ‘first do no harm’, informed consent, bodily autonomy and the notion that adults protect children – not the other way around.
twitter.com .
Also, particularly concerning was the erosion of free speech – a democratic principle that underpinned the ability to question untested interventions whilst ensuring other principles were upheld. The consequence was exposing the public, especially healthy young people – including children – to unacceptable risks of harm.
An honest and thorough investigation is needed, addressing the root causes that have led us to this place, including institutional group think, conflicts of interest and the suppression of scientific debate.
The Hope Accord also provides a page with links to some of the evidence they have relied on here.
You can sign it as a healthcare professional, a scientist or simply a concerned member of the public.
