Am i allowed to plagiarize myself according to the elder rules ? it seems like a waste of all that typing (and i did some today) not to get it a little more exposure ?
So, in response to
Well well well, glad i didn't forget how to read after this long ...
Several things there that might strike , id say all politics is a high form of (legalized) organized crime in the first place as it shares all traits from absolute law to a private militia / enforcers to enforce that (in this case the police) justified by the fact that the power in itself deludes people into thinking they CHOOSE while they actually simply choose the safest option there, now its pretty late, but.
I think anarchy when debated by scholars (which i am not, luckily i never went to school long enough to prevent having to build my own opinion by experience and research) always starts from the root. the -ism and i dare often say "any -ism (as good as all) is either a great idea or theory turned dogma", recited by heart by too many people who don't grasp the very soul of it anymore or actually never have done so but as subculture goes, fell into the group and derive identity (and safety) from the fact that it's unique to belong to a greater group that's not the norm (statistically)
So it's still linked to bomb-throwing by the roots, as it grew (as a lot of movements) from non-peaceful protests, which means extremes but its 2019, right ?
Kant is dead , Marx is dead ... Freud and Nietschze still have a lot to say but if they were born in the 1970s ? For one thing Freud would have been sued for malpractice and cocaine dealing (lol but yea) , what is anarchy ?
I think anarchy is THE LACK OF THE NEED to be governed ... what the -ism is ? I'm not an -ist but i do feel the ultimate form of government is no government at all, since that means "we are ready"
So it says somewhere inthere stuff about "duty" and "obligations" which i think contradicts the very concept in itself. You can't have anarchy and duty, but it requires the sense to do without debate what's needed, which is very complex if that has to apply to the whole social level. The lack of need to be told what to done, but ALSO the lack of need to be told what to do because it's easier to follow orders and do as you're told as that way its is never your fault if something goes wrong.
As the last shrink told me, its the way of least resistance (i would have liked to invite him to have lived the last 20 years of my life if this is the way of LEAST resistance ... even if it's passive a lot but if you're immobilized (not paralyzed, socially) you are passive by default, right ?
That's how i see it, call it filosofical anarchy, i prefer intellectual anarchy as a term - its closer to buddhist enlightenment somewhere but does not exclude violence as a concept either. When it's needed it's needed, WHICH
as it says somewhere inthere too : i don't think violent protest is "an obligation" , especially not the destruction of private property, probably by people who didn't even ask to be involved. If you are anarchy , how can you justify FORCING people to see your point of view ?
Much room for debate maybe, that said, in some cases it's unavoidable. I mean if it werent for violence europe would probably speak German by now, ... can turn that and say : if it werent for violence there would have been no need for violence or take it to a commonplace like violence begets violence, as with most things the classic left-right this/that axis falls way short of describing anything close to the resolution (as in pixels) of reality , and reality is certainly not one-dimensional ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)
anarchy in itself excluded obligation and replaces it with the sense of what is needed, which is a hard decision to make but given time and evolution, on social level its not impossible to get there ... if it's an -ism though then for some reason it involves people dicatting the norm , as per the standard social (probably physical and all kinds of mathematical) phenomenon that the norm (the middle of the bell curve) is "normal" because it represents what was needed to get to the state where things are, while constantly from all sides all entities on the fringe are trying to "get to the center" BUT in the end if one actually does it BECOMES the center, which makes it the norm ... (and i wonder why people keep telling me "i have no clue what you're trying to communicate" heh :D ...whic makes it the power which leads to all kinds entities from the fringe attacking it from all side
to fight "the power" ... (my usual meta-verse take on things without too many references as , as i said above, i never really went to school long enough :) )
There IS no obligation or duty for anything, so it stands to reason that there is no moral obligation or duty for violent protest, its just that if you let them walk all over you you end up flattened ... more like action/reaction where the exact opposite amount of force is needed "just to keep the balance" ...
complex stuff indeed so ...
lets have Musk elected american president so we can take off to mars for a social experiment with 50.000 people who feel they don't need to be governed first ...
i hope i made any kind of sense here, if i didnt no worries, i get that all the time ... lack of group-lingo as it was never indoctrinated in college or uni to walk and talk in the same way as the group - for i am kiplings cat in schroedingers nest ... i walk by myself and nobody seems to be sir or madam as all humans are alike to me and respect is earned, not given and ... you never know what you get until you open the box (<--tschhokay, time to put the proverbial cork in it)
which concludes today's post as i havent done nearly enough on "the game" today, good thing i rendered that scroll already yesterday or it would have been really slim ...
El Gato out ... twitter still won't let me in lol , but i think it's a browser-thing now
