Hello @acidyo,

Thanks you for your message. You have raised a vital question about how "We" as an ecosystem, should allocate Our shared resources to build value for Hive. It is exactly the question We should be discussing.

Your feedback, and that of other members, has led me to an inevitable conclusion: the current model for my initiative, which relies on post rewards, has proven not to be the right path. It generates a conflict that overshadows the project Our good intentions.

The underlying mission, however, I believe remains valid and vital for Hive. Strengthening Our applications, like the games that serve as gateways, is fundamentally an investment in new user acquisition and retention, in the network reputation as a space for serious projects, and in its onchain activity. It is precisely because the 'Why' is so important that I am searching for a 'How' that is correct and that builds up rather than divides.

And this is where I would like to ask for your perspective and opinion as one of the most respected and experienced users in the network.

Knowing that a direct donation model often lacks the scale to make a real impact, and that the post rewards model generates justified conflict, my question is:

• from your experience what principles or criteria do you believe a community project like this should follow to operate in a way that IS considered constructive?

I am not looking for a complete solution, but for wisdom on the fundamentals.

• Is there a 'hidden path' or a hybrid model that the community could accept?
• What kind of structure would you consider legitimate?

I am willing to redesign this project from Zero, but I want to do it on a solid ground. Your perspective would be valuable, not just for me, but for anyone on HIVE looking to build value without causing division.

Thank you again for your time and for pushing Us to learn.