This seems great to me.
But. When will witnesses realize that they must be "workers" and not direct beneficiaries of the content, nor the soul of Steemit?
More than anything because it should be assumed that the more participatory people, the more benefit to the Witnesses? If not. We have a big problem
Personally, I'm interested in these things ... Even if it's just out of curiosity. And I don't mind seeing it, even reading it. But.. if my partner, for example, reads this.
He runs out of Steemit and never returns..
Isn't it time we started ordering strictly technical publications about Steemit? And not make these contents monopolize the platform completely?
What happens if a Witness community is used? For example ... and maybe so.
Can we start trying to sort the contents of the platform ...?
Does anyone see Facebook or Twitter passing their Trello boards through the social network? Well, surely, this is how maybe some Steemit users feel..
Because Steemit always eats himself? Isn't it time to get out of the shell? and try to make Steemit something more professional, focused on external users.
I do not know. It is only a thought.
Try to make Steemit something more professional, focused on external users.
A more serious platform. More NATURAL in its use. In your participation.
I do not know. It is just a thought.
It is really necessary that "curators" invade the cover, labels and now also the new communities.
Seriously? Still having changes.
Will anyone start using Steemit with a healthy conscience ..? Nobody is going to try to change their attitude of seizing the platform, instead of trying to create a nice platform that attracts more users?
Seriously? This is told by someone who has been watching Steemit from the shadow for two years.
If there aren't many people inside Steemit who start considering certain attitudes.
Or we take advantage of the situation and we all start looking at our belly button and serious changes begin to be made. About the publications and the way of publishing.
Or it is absolutely impossible for this project to grow, no matter how much the future can contribute. Or @justinsunsteemit Or tron. O Jesus Christ.
While the people who control most of the publications and those who earn the most money are the witnesses themselves, while the communities are controlled by the witnesses themselves. While each Witness continues to focus the labels as he pleases.
So. It will be impossible to move forward.
Now more complicated. If each community is going to take its users to publish within their own community ...
To continue segregating more and more instead of unifying ... So that the contents can be fed back.
Steemit's path. It is being a cat eating its own tail. Forever?
It seems. Because if the platform tries to make changes, but its users use those changes for their own benefit, instead of the benefit of the platform itself.
It is impossible to evolve.
RE: Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated