Very interesting, and a fun read. The first two sentences (or whatever it is that shows up when I’m scrolling) caught my interest. I thought…do i read this? …and then I looked at your username and thought, yeah, I guess I do! - and I’m glad I did. Fun perspective to take on the subject, and accurate too. Like, was Marie Curie an expert on radioactive substances? I mean, at the time maybe she was the leading researcher, but no, technically they’re could have been no expert had there not first been leading researchers. So maybe the creators of such staples as ethereum and bitcoin…and even Hive could be known as leading researchers, but I agree, until we the capabilities of blockchain and crypto have seen their full potential realized, there almost can’t be an expert - but there is still remaining a a critical and pivotal role, without whom the experts of the future would have no grounds on which to stand…and that is the leading researchers; those who are exploring the space and daring to push for new use cases. Personally, I still want to see the DTCC replaced by a blockchain…that would be a huge step in the right direction, not just for crypto and blockchain tech, but also for a stock market whose known corruption has been eroding faith in itself on a global scale for at least several years. Anyway, thanks for having an awesome name, and for sharing this equally awesome post. Your insight has spurred in me a chain of thoughts that may otherwise not have taken place!