I first heard of the ridiculous Nazi charge when I used one of your posts which showed how Wikileaks was being misquoted to respond to a rabid Clinton supporter who was repeating the misquotes in comments

The point is not whether the DNC will put forward a genuine change candidate (they probably won't) but whether voters will stop believing that a change candidate cannot win.

I don't know where the quote is from.

Even The New Republic, hardly a voice for opposing interventionism, had an article warning about Russia hysteria starting a new cold war. I discussed this here (along with alos quoting Glenn Greenwald

The ads were technically illegal because of reporting requirements. Beyond that, they were not an act of war, they are not evidence of collusion with the Trump campaign, and they had nothing to do with

Trump’s failure to read the daily intelligence briefs is a real issue.

Fivethirtyeight.com also wrote about how Clinton cost the Democrats Congressional seats, as I cited in this post:

Yes, I believe the account of this from The Washington Post as it is entirely consistent with other information regarding how little Trump reads.