RE: RE: Proposal: reduce Hive inflation by reducing curation rewards
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Proposal: reduce Hive inflation by reducing curation rewards

Words
200
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
6y

Supporting the quality content should be a mandatory, the content that brings real value to the Hive.Blog or Peakd. The content should be the case why people really wanna read it. It's MEDIUM kinda content when readers really pay for reading that.

It's not about writing some code posts about HF updates (example) that lots of top 20 whales do, receiving huge rewards... that should be at least burned cuz most of them HDFunded, when social people see this, they also see a huge abyss between them, this could be discourageous.

Curators should be payed for curating - maybe. Good quality content creators need to be sure that their content will be needed and supported.

I really liked the idea written under the Solution 2, but in the direction of proof of verification ... it's like minting the NFT on the HE - you have to pay 4 that! Why not give the people some kind of the permission to post to the top topic communities which are going to represent Hive quality posts on the main page of HiveBlog or Peakd for burning some Hive? Starting from 5 Hive per post will stop people from shitposting - mining and make em feel more serious about what they are doing.

Regards

!BEER

@rollie1212: Supporting the | Ecency