Nevies, you haven't silenced me 😂 You've simply repeated the same unsupported leap - which you seem to do over and over.

“Women historically depended economically on men” does not logically lead to “therefore 50%+ of women today think about making money from men via their bodies.”

That's the leap, right?

But they are two completely different claims - evidence connecting them isn't your FEELING that it “makes sense”.

And yes, saying 80% of a group behaves a certain way is quite literally a sweeping generalisation. Leaving out 20% doesn't somehow stop it being one no matter what you say.

As for my "jibes': mocking a weak argument doesn't make the argument stronger or suggest 'winning' - bizarre you are seeing it as a competition and feel the need to 'win', saying quote a bit about your ego.

“You made a joke, therefore I won” isn't the intellectual flex you seem to think it is.

Anyway, I can't be bothered talking in circles now. I was pointing out a few things you should think about - digging your heels in so inflexible on your generalisations and flawed understanding of feminism isn't a flex or a 'win' and it certainly wasn't mean to be a battle where one cries victory, it was meant to be a discussion.

I'm disengaging with your inanity now. I should have scrolled on by. My silence now is because I have other people to engage with. Ciao