Well, i am glad that you are willing to have a conversation with such an extremist nonetheless. And you are probably right that we might agree on the world wed like to see. As for terminology, ancap is fine though i would describe myself as voluntaryist, its a similar result but the philosophical foundations are maybe a bit different.

Tell me, which capitalist benefits from this? The corporations are all socialist, in fact corporations are a socialist, more precisly, facist, idea. We dont have a free market, the USA for example went fully socialist in 1798.
In fact, aquiring a lot of currency in this system i would indeed see as an indication that you probably arent a capitalist seen as it is government issued currency, not to far of from a socialist credit system.

As for my name, my account is old and my name older, just a joke while shaving.

" that's extremism to a tee." Of course it is. Or another word to use here would be "consistency".

Now i wouldnt agree with point 3 here, life in itself doesnt mean much to me. Even human life, ive lost a few good friends to suicide and in fact regret not taking that route a few years ago when my trigeminal neuralgia started myself, obviously i couldnt have known back then how long it would take to be treated. Had i known then that amount of pain over that long a timeframe wouldnt have been worth it.

"And if a private company demands that their employees get vaccinated, that's entirely in line with your ideology of private justice, security and law entirely determined by free markets. Right?"
It would be, yes. And so would a worker coop btw, worker-coops are still capitalist provided everyone thats part of it agreed to be and they dont force themselves on anyone else.
Anything that does not involve the initiation of violence is in line with my ideas.
Now, lets get back to the real world though. In the real world, companies exist under the states monopoly on violence, competition is heavily hindered by that.
Monopolies in general couldnt exist under a capitalistic framework.

You entirely sidestep the idea of a free market. For instance, in a free market the black community does not have to allow a racist security provider in their neighbourhood. If workers are mistreated or underpayed theyll just make their own company taking their expertise with them. Or maybe they unionise and coordinate their end of the deal. Currently thats often prevented by licensing, beurocracy, noncompete clauses (on that or rather on contracts in general, i would recommend https://mises.org/wire/why-property-rights-are-absolute-contracts-are-not ), we certainly dont have a free market.

The same, of course, applies to mistreating or overcharging customers. Why buy an iphone from apple if you can buy it from the former employees that left them after being underpaid for half the price? And maybe without all the shitty serialisation bullshit.

"the best place to get an honest advice about it is your doctor, just ask him or her."
I know. And i know that i shouldnt get it becouse of my preexisting conditions seen as most the sideffects appear to be autoimmune reactions and i have an autoimmune disorder, multiple sclerosis.

"and that is the point about the virus becoming more infectious but less deadly"
Well, yes. Not just less deadly, if you are ill enough to stay in the bed or at least at home you arent going to spread it, either. But weve gotten used to looking at the number of infected instead of hospitalisations or deaths, we in germany even have the supression measures trigger based on number of infections (by the way, even the lower end of false positives if you tested everyone in a region with a PCR-test you would comfortably get to the number that triggers the most severe supression measures.
Another thing about those numbers combined with the measures, if the vaccinated dont have to do all those tests, guess what? The number of infected would go down even if the vaccine does absolutely nothing becouse less people are getting tested. Just a point of note to keep in mind.

And of course, its not like theres no consequences. Even the UN speaks of 10.000 children starving each months as a result of our measures while 500.000 people are pushed into extreme poverty (im not rich, either, btw, im disabled and on welfare. And, yes, while in my case i can in good times be productive if left to my devices which sadly means economic activity in the white markets is a problem with all those regulations and all that beurocracy, but of course there are people that really cant be. For that, family, friends, communities, mutual aid societies like the freemasons are good bets, definately preferable to the state. And all of those have more than twice as many ressources if they arent taxed.