It is what it is at this point, the only material change here is that the proposal is broken into separate proposals. Which is fantastic, until you get to #4. 4A and 4B are mutually exclusive. The only reason to put those together is to play head games with us all. See, 4a, is an obvious yes. But, 4b is the most contentious part of this whole thing. Who would not be OK with people getting refunds from SPL? But, that has absolutely nothing to do with increasing the window of time and hence breaking the commitment of what was promised as the terms of the pre-sale. The only way that 4b doesn't pass now is if the DAO decides to also screw people out of refunds from the company. Well played, Aggy. Well Played!!