RE: RE: Help us fix a DLease Bug - 200 BUILDTEAM + 200 STEEM Bounty
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Help us fix a DLease Bug - 200 BUILDTEAM + 200 STEEM Bounty

raycoms(70)
Published in
#dlease
Words
57
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
7y

Why is already_withdrawn = to_withdraw - withdrawn?
That should be the quantity which is not withdrawn yet and which is missing yet.
(That's the number we use at the moment).
If I do a math.min on that with the withdraw_rate the available quantity doubles and we're already displaying too much.

A bit more detail of our calc:

        store.powerOwned = parseInt( result[ 0 ].vesting_shares.split( " " )[ 0 ] );
        store.powerDelegated = parseInt( result[ 0 ].delegated_vesting_shares.split( " " )[ 0 ] );
        store.powerReceived = parseInt( result[ 0 ].received_vesting_shares.split( " " )[ 0 ] );
        store.poweringDown = parseInt( (result[ 0 ].to_withdraw - result[ 0 ].withdrawn) / 1000000 )
        store.votingPower = result[ 0 ].voting_power / 10000;
@raycoms: Why is | Ecency