Login
Discover
Waves
Communities
Login
Signup
Ray
@raycoms
70
Just one of those coders
Followers
995
Following
32
Follow
Resource Credits
Available
Used
Location
Planet Earth
Website
https://github.com/Raycoms
Created
2017-08-21 15:14
RSS Feed
Subscribe
Comments
Blog
Posts
Comments
Communities
Wallet
raycoms
socialblockchain
2020-03-13 19:40
RE: Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group
Are there ways to join in on the fun when things are kicking off?
$ 0.041
1
3
raycoms
blockchain
2020-03-12 23:49
RE: In the Beginning, There Was DPoS
Most of the truly asynchronous protocols are only probabilistic. (Similar to avalanche). However this concept is very old already(many papers from the 90s discuss it. If we have some known max delays we
$ 0.000
1
raycoms
blockchain
2020-03-12 22:32
RE: In the Beginning, There Was DPoS
ALL distributed BFT-consensus systems are based on synchronicity assumption. That's wrong, there are BFT algorithms without synchronicity assumptions: Haveras Hashgraph is asynchronous Honeybadger Those
raycoms
blockchain
2020-03-12 18:47
RE: In the Beginning, There Was DPoS
Yes, exactly. 3f+1 total nodes where f nodes are faulty means that we need 2f+1 honest nodes to guarantee progress in a classical BFT protocol. I don't see where in DPOS the message complexity comes in
raycoms
blockchain
2020-03-11 13:24
RE: In the Beginning, There Was DPoS
Yeah, but I think that can be solved by thing I pointed out. Financial incentive On top of that, it could probably be a bit more prominent in the UI and when you go to your wallet it shows in red "No
raycoms
blockchain
2020-03-11 12:05
RE: In the Beginning, There Was DPoS
The most important thing to defend against a hostile takeover is to guarantee overlap. Let's assume the extreme of only 1 vote. Assuming the community has 200kmvests to distribute, in the optimal case
raycoms
blockchain
2020-03-11 11:24
RE: In the Beginning, There Was DPoS
If you were allowed to vote infinite witnesses you could even set several proxies. That would make it more trustless. I might not trust 1 persons decisions, but I might trust the average among 5 people.
raycoms
blockchain
2020-03-11 11:16
RE: In the Beginning, There Was DPoS
I think it sets the entry barrier to high for new users. Someone who just arrived doesn't know anyone and has no stake to vote anyway. But with increasing stake there should be a financial incentive to
raycoms
blockchain
2020-03-11 11:11
RE: In the Beginning, There Was DPoS
There is now way to make a 51% attack impossible. Actually it's even proven that you need 2f+1 honest nodes (roughly 2/3) to guarantee progress. Dan avoids this by making synchronous assumptions. However,
raycoms
blockchain
2020-03-11 11:07
RE: In the Beginning, There Was DPoS
My idea was more in the lines of not giving people SP inflation unless they use at least 50% of their slots to vote for active witnesses.
raycoms
blockchain
2020-03-11 09:27
RE: In the Beginning, There Was DPoS
Read my blogpost, it's not a solution either.
raycoms
blockchain
2020-03-11 08:56
RE: In the Beginning, There Was DPoS
I think the biggest problem related to any "voting-based" system is: Voting Apathy A lot of people won't participate in the democratic process and do not hold the elected accountable for their
raycoms
blockchaindev
2020-03-09 22:27
RE: Hello, world.
How else can people get involved in this process?
raycoms
SCT.암호화폐.Crypto
2020-03-09 12:48
RE: Let's change 1SP 30 votes (current) to 1SP 1vote
What else? =D
raycoms
SCT.암호화폐.Crypto
2020-03-09 12:13
RE: Let's change 1SP 30 votes (current) to 1SP 1vote
For me defense, I could've made a 10 page double column paper out of this =D
raycoms
SCT.암호화폐.Crypto
2020-03-09 11:10
RE: Let's change 1SP 30 votes (current) to 1SP 1vote
I did a short analysis:
raycoms
SCT.암호화폐.Crypto
2020-03-08 21:56
RE: Let's change 1SP 30 votes (current) to 1SP 1vote
A few points: You don't need a super majority for a softfork to lock up stake. You just need a normal majority. (Longest chain wins). It's funny how many people throw around 1SP1 Vote, or reduce to three
raycoms
SCT.암호화폐.Crypto
2020-03-07 14:23
RE: [공지]Four-Party Dialogue Proposal (Steem foundation, Tron foundation, Steem witnesses, and Korean community)
Rather than having two people of the Korean community (Host and 1 Member) I believe there should be two witnesses of the previous top 20. Those witnesses represent the entire community and not just a part
raycoms
steem
2020-03-07 14:17
RE: The Facts
For sure, now we have to make things work somehow. I don't deny that. And I'm also 100% sure that we have to do this rationally and with a cold head. Insults don't bring us anywhere.
raycoms
steem
2020-03-07 14:16
RE: The Facts
But in this case, the dude told yesterday my buddies wife that he found her beautiful and then actually fucked her. On the next day he told my wife that he found her beautiful. I don't want to jump to
← Latest
Older →
