Disagree with which part? The part about Dan Larimer is a verifiable fact which I was kind enough to offer a citation which is honestly supererogatory of me. Musk is considering buying Twitter to restructure it but him buying a bunch of Hive won't solve its problems. These people engaged Dan in bad faith and it's unlikely they'll make an impact with Musk. You're welcome to shill and dogpile but it won't change the facts. Musk would vet the chain and find out what's already known about it. Arguments can be made that downvoting is necessary for a healthy ecosystem but it's still anti free speech by definition.