sounds like scam, dude

@originalworks

Thanks for a good question! Would you mind asking it again here? We'd like to have those discussions on Rados so that they're searchable within our platform.

yeah. or basically just mandate all exchanges to comply with AML/KYC, and make that the only legal way to convert between crypto and fiat. Let crypto be unregulated, but perform checks when someone wants

speaking of centralization:

What I like about lightning network when compared to Ethereum's proof-of-stake plans is that LN is open and explicit about the centralization risks and is an opt-in mechanism. If you don't want to use

I share your worries, and I believe most of the active crypto community members do. I think it'll be a niche thing targeted at mass market. Think cheap (or even free to the consumer) bitcoin/litecoin paypal,

Opening a payment channel requires two parties, but a payment channel can be unilaterally closed by either one. So in this case, the economic incentive to close the payment channel is on the person who

Hey, they say there might be negative fees for some transactions I think people will keep using bitcoin as they already do. But businesses will probably be paying large lightning node operators for an

Indeed. The tech can be ready, but if nobody cares to use it then it might have never existed. Still, at least with litecoin Charlie Lee is working with wallet developers, so I presume there will be a

Many big-blockers are using the phrase "vaporware"; if I've understood it right we do have "proof-of-concept", but it's a long, long way until we can get "lightning support"

If you can't beat them - join them. When cryptocurrencies reach a certain critical mass banks will swiftly reengineer themselves. And also, just maybe, those will be new banks, created specifically for

@kenhudoy, first of all, registration is absolutely free! You only need to register if you want to reply to published insights or if you want to sign up for our weekly digest newsletter. In terms of how

I can assure you, wherever you reposted this from was telling you bullshit. It was probably a bug in sequence-to-sequence modeling, where they were working on creating better facebook bots. They probably

@kenhudoy, the answer to the first question is published in another comment. As for the second question, @sophtcodr has indeed published a nice link to our product description: The difference between steemit

Thank you, @sophtcodr, for you kind words! We're moving away from steemit for a number of reasons: a) we want all our insights to be searchable on our platform b) all future products developed by Rados

It's mentioned in this blog post

@originalworks

Bloomberg for cryptocurrencies is such a big void in the market, glad to see more people willing to tackle the problem - at the end of the day we all benefit from great blockchain projects, doesn't matter

Ping us in comments when you publish your project, would love to take a look! If you're interested in applying research and statistics to cryptocurrencies you'll love using Rados.