READER NOTE: to see this article with all links, images and formatting in place, please visit our primary blogsite at augenguy.blogspot.com. Thank you!
Previous posts:
Deep Throat v. Q
Q The Conspiracy - A Phenomenon
The Gospel According To Q
A-Marketing We Will Q
The Name Of The Q
Q The LARP Carp
Spe-Q-lating On Q
In The Twilight Of The Q
Jonesing For Q
Analyzing Q-Analysis
The Silence of the Q
The Q Prophesy
To Q Or Not To Q
A Quantum Of Q-Bit
Surfing the Q Wave
CQ CQ CQ
Q Tips And Quislings
Some Quick Q
The Voice Of Q
The Q Treason
Q The Endgame
Right On Q?
Q The God-Emperor
Who Is Q?
Let me begin with some "B Proofs". I have stated in several articles and interviews on Rense Radio that I suspected Q follower numbers were being inflated as rewards to the Anons and Commentators, as well as a means to control the perception of the operation's effectiveness.
The proof recently came on the "Patriots Fight" board. For those not deep into this operation, Q has two boards on 8chan - one where Q exclusively posts its Drops (no other posts), and one where the Anons (Apostles and Acolytes) can post their research and comments.
The reader should also be aware that there are several sites where the Drops are re-posted, numbered, titled, and often share space with POTUS (President of the United States) tweets and Anon posts. Two of the most popular of these sites are Qanon.pub and Qmap.pub. Qmap had a user count at the top of the page, which commonly showed more than 200,000 online users at most times.
The screenshot here shows that the Admin of Qmap became aware of inflated user numbers via a hack of the system, and subsequently took the counter off the page.
I contend that if it is proven here, then the probability of it happening on other outlets has increased significantly. The reported numbers of Q Followers should be viewed with a skeptical eye.
There is also the matter of the [-21] day countdown that was to culminate on 19 March. I clearly indicated that nothing would happen of any importance to the Spygate scandal, as many Qvians predicted (DECLAS of FISA for one).
The three events that did happen were the Christchurch mosque shootings, Trump vetoing the Senate's repeal of his Border National Emergency (BNE), and Attorney General Barr's blessing of the BNE on 15 March. The Qvians either heralded the BNE as being the Big Event, or that the Christchurch attacks had stolen the headlines from any Trump surprises.
The oft-repeated excuse for Q Fails is that the Drop was "disinformation" or a "decoy" for the Deep State to get them to expend "ammunition," and thus be rendered ineffective when the "real" news came (see Q3165)
In Q3078, Q clearly says that the Christchurch attacks were "not big enough" to pull headlines away from Trump bombshells. This and other Drops from Q imply that it had foreknowledge of the attacks, or at minimum inside information. If this is the case, then why didn't Q expose the attacks before, or at minimum after?
This appears to be callous disregard for human life, and/or usurpation of tragedy to advance its agenda. Either way, not a pretty picture, and one we have repeatedly seen with Q (see Q3077). Even in the face of this tragedy, Q highlights its countdown (see Q3173).
Let us now turn to the Q Cult, or Qult. We begin with a definition of "cult":
noun
a system of religious veneration and devotion directed toward a particular figure or object. - "the cult of St. Olaf"
a relatively small group of people having religious beliefs or practices regarded by others as strange or sinister. - "a network of Satan-worshiping cults"
a misplaced or excessive admiration for a particular person or thing. - "a cult of personality surrounding the leaders"
As I have pointed out many times in previous articles, particularly "The Gospel According to Q" linked above, there is a very definite religious flavor bot to Q's Drops and to the fervor with which the Qvians adhere to its pronouncements. Religion is a common theme in Trump's speeches and press conferences.
From Q's liberal use of Bible passages to the frequent inclusion of religious messages in much of the commentary. It is important to note this, as it is integral to my contention that Q is, or at least behaves as, a cult leader. Not only does Q meet the first definition of "cult" above, but it also falls squarely under the third. The combination of the two is most disconcerting. It brings up connotations of the Queen of England, the King of Thailand, the Catholic Pope, or the Ayatollahs of Iran, who have both religious and political power. Not a comforting image.
That being said, the primary thrust of this article is to demonstrate how Q controls the narrative - and thus followers - within the Qniverse (my term for all things Q). Q is obviously softening followers to activate on command. While it has been mostly benign to date, there is no reason to assume that it will remain so (see Q3077 ff.).
My thesis here is predicated on the repeated imperatives from Q to "use logic" and "use reason," or "look here, don't look there". Despite dozens of instances of Q literally ordering followers to do something, it is surprising how few apply critical thinking to the situation, especially when it comes to examining the language that Q uses
A primary reason Q - and other psy-ops - are so effective is that it subverts incredulity through the use of provable facts and "predictions" to lower resistance in the minds of followers and insert selected narratives and even false information into the individual's conscious thoughts. The follower then perceives the world through the installed prism, where only selected points of view filter through.
An example would be the way the Nazi Party in Germany used very real cultural and economic threats to inject Final Solutions that did not address the real problems, but scapegoated segments of the population that were then widely perceived to be the cause of suffering. Events such as the Reichtstag Fire and Kristalnacht are frequently cited examples. We see similar currents in Trump rally crowds.
In the case of Q, it has continually targeted media and the Democratic Party in the US. While the nation's real problem is social, moral and cultural decay, Q has successfully laid the burden on demographic symptoms, rather than actual issues. The abcense of invective against Republicans is telling.
We have seen this before far too many times.
We see this in Q Drops and the extensive musings of the Qvians. At no point do they see the System as the problem, only select groups within it.
Issues such as the wildly ballooning public debt, or the massive flooding in the Midwest US and the coming inflation in food prices, or the morality of taxation. or the federal government's involvement in public education are completely ignored.
Public funding of grotesque "art" through the National Endowment for the Arts, or billions of dollars in hand-outs to nations that are philosophically anathema to US ideals are never mentioned. The rampant hiding of results from publicly-funded science and the mafia-like protection of Big Pharma and other industries don't rate a footnote.
Instead, we are treated to nearly non-stop haranguing of mass media, gleeful teasing of opposition politics, and ubiquitous flag waving and patriotic back-clapping.
In opposition to the long-standing American tradition of suspicion towards large, centralized government, Q is leading its followers to blind, unquestioning faith in it and the vainglorious hope - even faith - that the System can cure itself by administering more of what made it sick.
This is a classic case of the Edward Bernays model of Public Relations. Evoke a specific set of emotional responses, then transfer them to whatever person, product or organization one chooses.
In the case of Q, followers are being told they are under direct and dire threat. Their families and property are being attacked, or will soon be. The resulting fear and "circle the wagons" instinct is then transferred to whatever target Q chooses - in this case, the media and Democrats - used almost interchangeably. The followers thus adhere to each other for "protection" and begin to group-think.
While the threats may or may not be real, the emotional responses are real, and those responses are targeted wherever the central cult figure points its finger.
Q has done nothing that any dedicated individual could not do. Q has published hundreds of links to articles, photos and videos in the public domain, something many of us regularly do on social media. The difference is that the links and messages are strung together to form a narrative with a particular viewpoint.
In fact, all of the heavy lifting to reveal hidden documents and conspiracies has been done by Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch, by Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, and by dozens of nameless, faceless people who risked their well-being to get those documents into the public domain. Yet, the Qvians place all the glory at Q's feet, and Q does nothing to disabuse them of this undeserved adulation. It is my contention that this is exactly what Q's intention is.
The process works like this: first, gain the trust of a large number of followers; next, transfer that trust onto Donald Trump; finally, take credit for all positive developments and ignore the rest.
As I have clearly demonstrated in prior articles, Q is a technology - a particularly powerful one at that - which is in the possession of government agencies. We must ask ourselves, if Trump is re-elected and the pressure of campaigning is no longer a factor, what then? Furthermore, if Trump loses in 2020, or leaves in 2024, and someone else assumes the office, what will that person do with this technology?
We must assume that the opposition is well aware of Q, given the large number of media hit pieces out there, and they will surely have been thinking what they could do with such a tool. We must also assume that even if Q is publicly "revealed," we will likely not get the whole, or even true story.
Q has shifted its narrative several times, and the Qvians unquestioningly follow the lead. Q has already established an "infallibility doctrine" among a great many followers, and they work feverishly to prove every Q Pronouncement correct, rather than critically dissecting and examining the pieces.
Q is by definition a cult. Its followers offer unquestioned credulity, assume they know its identity and relentlessly evangelize Q's message, which are all hallmarks of cults. The Qvians heap unearned praise on their unseen leader and its public manifestation of Donald Trump. They attribute all manner of victories to Q, and wave away any failures with consensus apologetics. They produce and display objects of faith, such as hundreds of hours of video, clothing, stickers, banners, and so on.
It is one thing to hold harmless pep rallies, and quite another to hold torchlight processions. Can we honestly and naively assume that the movement before us will not devolve into the latter?
Behold the Qult.
