Value of dr zakir naik

queen61(44)
Published in
#busy
Words
471
Reading
3 min
Listen
Play
9y

Dr. Zakir Naik is basically an Islamic preacher. This world recognizes him as this. He followed the Hanafi and salafiyat in the Fiqh. One of his personal opinions is that he opposes the identity of 'Ahl al Hadith'.
In his lecture or question-answer, there is no difference of opinion between the fiqh month or ulamay kiram 5%. Most of the footage related to the fiqh massacres online appeared much earlier and he did not say aggressive like many others. In the context of a disagreement with the previous year, about four-and-a-half years ago, he questioned the scholars for referring to Ulama. Many are not updated about his changed policy.
When he came to meet PCTTV speakers in Dubai, for the first time, a speaker made an indication of the invitation to some Deobandi ulamay karam on Peace TV, a speaker. In response, Dr. Zakir Naik clearly said, I want harmony. I think, except for the Shia and (the Braille) graves, others can be united. The places of mutual differences between Deobandi, Jamaat-e-Islami and Ahle Hadith are very rare. (He made this comment in the presence of at least 10-15 speakers, and I was sitting just one hand away from him.)

unnamed (1).jpg

A large doctor told me, 'I used to be a student union. I did not get any answers to my questions about Islam, from the scholars. But suddenly Zakir Naik came to listen to the lecture and got satisfying answers to all questions'. From then on leaving the student union, he and his family tried to follow Islam completely.
People who are in Bangladesh. Although Zakir Naik was influenced by his vast majority, he was nominally Muslim, but the trust and faith in Islam was not in full, nor any interest in Islam; Even the invitation to a scholar could not influence them.
Many of our complaints are in the allegations that many of the people of the Umayyim (representing extremist issues and spreading hatred towards the scholars and seeding of dissonance) Zakir Naik seems to be the absolute duty to raise his voice, those allegations are far more than the other existing ones. But all the witty Dr. Zakir Naik over!
When the Indian government wanted to insult the people of Braille and hard Hindus, Darul Uloom Deoband, giving fatwa against him once, gave sympathy to him. But when the world-wide non-Muslim superpowers jumped on the man, we increased the level of attacks against him! Today, taking one hat of Zakir Naik has become a fashion. In this, the distance between the large sections of the common people (who are not Ahl al-Hadith) is also increasing.
The Muslim scholars have very few footprints in the sector where they are working. But the important issue of time! Do we get hurt in such a situation, we are not harming a person?