RE: RE: Proposal for Updating Liquidity Providers Rewards Distribution
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Proposal for Updating Liquidity Providers Rewards Distribution

quantumnachos(49)
Published in
#glxproposal
Words
20
Reading
1 min
3y

I disagree with the distribution percentages and the inclusion/exclusion of certain token pairs on the list. Therefore I'm voting no.

glxproposal
via peakd
This post was published via peakd. Ecency is not the originator or editor of this content and displays it for discovery purposes only.
0