Hello @mariegna,
We are always very happy when Hivers contribute beautiful photos to the LIL. It doesn't really matter if the photos are taken by a professional photographer or are private photos of certain minimum quality.
A minimum quality is very important, because the overall quality of the library depends on whether the images in it are usable in any way. Therefore @shaka asked in the LIL announcement post to only contribute images of sufficient resolution and decent quality.
Unfortunately, the photos above do not even begin to meet the requirements of the community in terms of usability. This is because the quality is so low that it is hard to identify details in the photos. Imagine if someone wanted to cut something out of one of them for a collage, it could not succeed in an acceptable quality.
However, I would like to help you in this matter by adding a short quality guide to this comment below.
Reference table for sufficient image resolutions (width & height in pixels. width & height can be swapped.):
| Factor | Width | Height | Aspect ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad | 320 | 200 | 4:3 |
| Bad | 640 | 480 | 4:3 |
| Bad | ... | ... | ... |
| Low details | 1280 | 720 | 16:9 |
| Low details | 1600 | 1200 | 4:3 |
| Good | 1800 | 1200 | 3:2 |
| Good | 1920 | 1080 | 16:9 |
| Very good | 2560 | 1440 | 16:9 |
| Very good | 2048 | 1536 | 4:3 |
| Very good | 2272 | 1704 | 4:3 |
| Awesome | 2432 | 1368 | 16:9 |
| Awesome | 2500 | 1875 | 4:3 |
| Most awesome | 3072 | 2048 | 3:2 |
| Most awesome | 3200 | 1800 | 16:9 |
| Most awesome | 3264 | 2448 | 4:3 |
| Excellent | 3840 | 2160 | 16:9 |
| Excellent | ... | ... | ... |
Other factors for good quality:
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or the other mods of this community. You can contact us in our Discord Channel.
Best regards
RE: LIL: My Contribution # 6 To LMAC