"Clown" implies an intent to make laugh or deceive, depending on the audience. I have not seen evidence of any of this from Greenyer.

I think you are deeming something "word salad" because you don't comprehend the specific language he is using to describe things that are not common knowledge. By this logic, you could call Dr. Wood's presentations "word salad" because she uses "dustification", "Cheetos", and "fuzzballs" to describe certain distinct phenomena.

In your playlist, you've selected his most out-there positions and collected them together for the purpose of attacking his character. Might I remind you that this very tactic has been used against Dr. Woods.

I agree with your opinion that Greenyer has some divergent and speculative views on other matters that may not logically compute under scrutiny. However, this does not affect his conclusions around the mechanism of dustification that Dr. Wood has provided evidence of.

Take note that John Hutchison appears to have other personalities, and has created Youtube channels where he crossdresses and lets those personalities have free reign. While this does not personally irk me, even if it did, it does not affect the results he's discovered in his lab experiments.

While I appreciate your evidence collection around the 9/11 weirdness, I find it odd that you attack someone like Greenyer in such a direct and derogatory manner.