I'll point out a few example.

From your post:
In 1958 William Higginbotham created, using a trajectory calculation program and an oscilloscope, Tennis for Two: a table tennis simulator for the entertainment of visitors to Brookhaven National Laboratory.

From the article:

From your post:
In 1966 Ralph Baer began to develop, together with Albert Maricon and Ted Dabney, a video game project called Fox and Hounds, giving birth to the home video game. This project would evolve into the Magnavox Odyssey, the first home video game system launched in 1972 that connected to the television and allowed playing various pre-recorded games.

From the article:

From your post:
At the end of their particular crisis, the North Americans continued the path opened by the Japanese and adopted the NES as the main video game system. Throughout the decade, new domestic systems appeared, such as the Master System (Sega), the Amiga (Commodore) and the 7800 (Atari), which enjoyed different levels of popularity depending on the region, and games now considered classics such as Alexey Pajitnov's Tetris.

From the article:

I could point out more.

I get your point about scientific data and that history can't be rewritten. I do however find it to be to big of a coincidence that you and the author of this article are using the exact same words in so many of your paragraphs.

The author of this article is Juan Villegas. Your name is Julian. Or do you mean to say that Juan has stolen this article from you in the first place?