Yeah, I'm aware that doing an ICO can get the SEC to classify you as a security. That was never even considered. The post was about just selling POB on hive-engine.

The other downvotes are probably from a war against heajin/ranchorelaxo.

Here is an invite to the POB Discord: Once you're in there you can dm me: POB#6372 I'm not really interested in making money. I am interested in spreading truth.

Very good to know! Would that be true if it's just selling POB for HIVE? I wouldn't do it just of that reason if so. Paying a dev with POB wouldn't be any problem though right?

I gave you a 100% upvote to try to balance that out a bit. Have they given any comment on why they are downvoting? I can't see anything in those posts that would warrant a downvote.

Good questions I just delegated to people that I noticed being active in curation and engagement on POB. I liked to see people voting on lots of post made on proofofbrain.io and engaging meaningfully.

This is interesting! I'll have to look into this.

I could not agree more with the sentiment here. However, I don't see anything proposed to make it better? Down voting allows bad values to flourish – and all , by definition - at the expense of love.

People write laws, but there are also universal laws that apply to us, whether we write them or not.

I know downvoting has it's problems but I haven't seen a better solution proposed, including the one in the op.

Yes, I'm aware. I was referring to this statement that you made: I've been arguing your arguments for the last four years. The post made an argument for capping rewards. So I was trying to understand because

If hive was to fail / crash in token price – is it technically possible to move the POB platform over to somewhere else, to another blockchain, quickly? It is technically possible, but currently there

The ideas proposed in this post seem to be more socialistic in nature to me. Are you saying you support this argument for capping rewards @lucylin? What arguments here are also the ones that you have been

POB is not about creating good feels or an equality of outcome. It's about rewarding authentic engaging content. I've upvoted this post because it raised questions and calls out the DEV team, which I think

It's a tool that can be used to do things that are good for the platform and things that are not. I would prefer to see investors delegating to real human curators over autovoting. But I think centralization

The experiment was that whales wouldn't vote at all, if I remember correctly, and we saw how everyone else's upvote became worth much more. I've been thinking about doing that at some point, but first

We are not doing that currently but maybe we should.

Nice! We should chat. Are you on discord? I'm POB#6372 and here is the POB channel I agree with @antonym, I'm thinking we should probably do these things: Notifications Hive Wallet Management Text Editor

We are no longer accepting HP delegations for POB delegations.

The decent thing to do would be to back up your claims with evidence. You didn't do that because your claims are baseless.