Just because you're out of luck, orphaned, or disabled, doesn't mean the laws of gravity any longer apply to you or you're wasting your time.
American Indians support India.
The Chinese have China.
The Russians have Russia.
The Turks have Turkey.
Armenians have Armenia.
Mexicans have Mexico.
Arabs have an Ummah.
Supporting states are actively involved in the organization, governance, and infrastructure of their minorities in the United States, regardless of whether they are US citizens.
Do African Americans have a supportive country to protect them, demonstrate diplomatic force on their behalf, or retaliate when necessary?
Does the supporting state participate in the organization, leadership, and infrastructure of African Americans?
When was the last time a unified nation-state defended African Americans?
Every minority needs a boss with enough power to protect them from abuse in a foreign country.
The continuing vulnerability of African Americans in the United States is due in large part to the simple fact that they can be mistreated without fear of retaliation or financial repercussions.
Isn't the African Union an institution strong enough to play this role?
What African country could play this role?
Ghana is pleased to attract billions of dollars from African Americans when it comes to its marketing for tourism and business, but the government of Ghana will remain silent when African Americans face police violence and murder in the United States.
Nigeria, seeing Ghana raising billions from African Americans, launched a program last year to attract African American tourism and investment, but like Ghana, Nigeria kept silent when African Americans needed a national state to protect them.
Zimbabwe and Guinea were the last courageous countries to advocate for justice for African Americans, but these countries have recently been compromised by neo-colonial elites.
Aside from finding a nation-state to support them, the bigger question is, why don't African states see African-Americans as an African diaspora to be protected?
On the other hand, those same countries are brave enough to support the United States, China, and South Africa when their citizens are victims of violence or discrimination.
We saw this recently with discriminatory events in China and South Africa.
What can cause emotional ties between African states and African Americans?
Should African Americans arbitrarily choose an African country and claim ethnic or tribal affiliation with that country in an effort to be recognized as belonging to the official ethnic group?
If so, what is your personality? They could not say that we are a black ethnic group in Africa. It would be funny! Everyone here is black. They need a different name for the ethnic group, what could it be?
A tribe of "African Americans" in Africa?
It would be even more ridiculous, because the identity of the script would raise the question: "What does American mean in a name?", "Does American represent the white cultural side of your identity?"
Also, the African part of his name no longer makes sense because all the tribes of Africa are obviously African. So the only distinctive part of your identity is "American."
Would you call your tribe in Nigeria or Ghana "Americans"? What if a white American comes to Nigeria, can he join his tribe?
The Kenyan Indians applied for and became an official Kenyan Indian tribe. They did not call themselves Kenyans. They are Indians in Kenya. They keep their Indian culture, their names, their festivals and add them to the Kenyan tribal salad.
What "African American" culture, names, religion, and festivals will you bring to your newly adopted countries?
Now I hope you understand how important semantics is and how confusion and confusion spread without semantic clarity.
Therefore, this article looks first at the patronage of African Americans by African states and then how this connection can be built on the basis of a clear identity of African Americans.
