duckduckgoose (Jun 28, 2016 12:38:06 GMT -5)
First a disclaimer; I'm not greedy, nor am I crazy about the idea of personally benefiting from the doings of morally corrupt companies - that corruption is certainly happening worldwide, daily. Ya don't need to look further than consumer goods companies making billions by selling/marketing citizens of the world poison (China National Tobacco, Philip Morris, Japan Tobacco International, British American Tobacco, Imperial Tobacco Group to name a few).I just think this is an interesting topic of discussion. Believe it or not, I have no designs whatsoever on being wealthy in a traditional sense, to me a wealth of knowledge is vastly more important. I say the hunger for material goods and $$ is clearly a distractive device to keep people in line, and I'd have to say it's working quite well.. People are concerned with raising money for ass implants to look better in their jeans these days, it's sick."It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society" - Jiddu Krishnamurti I fully subscribe to thisThis board details a lot of the horrific lengths that people will go to to achieve their dreams of fame and financial security. To me it's all quite vain, wildly excessive and seriously lacking perspective, all while there's reportedly 20,000 people dying of hunger daily.. I do like the idea of hunting down these companies because in a way it seems to me like a possible avenue to 'get back' a little something, and if snowballed correctly the profits could be used to give back to people being oppressed by the system and who genuinely could use the help.. Unless I've missed it Don doesn't subscribe to some 'get off of money, go move to the mountains/live off the land and pray for forgiveness' type of solution to these issues. So I couldn't help but make this thread, seems appropriate to talk about this here more than anywhere else.. Genuinely interested in the responses this thread will get, even if its for nothing more than brainstorming. Back to the question in the thread title though. If things are rigged they way Don says they are, that means they can't possibly tie up all the loose ends, all the time, it's not even remotely feasible. 1000's of companies are involved and probably looking to acquire lesser companies not directly in the plan, to get the real competition off the market ('the little guy').. All of which could result and be viewed as what a day-trader might call "low hanging fruit"..Obviously Don seeks to smite the evil people involved and their companies eventually. But thats probably not going to happen by next week, or next month (correct me if im wrong). So in the interim there's still going to be massive movements in the valuations of said companies and therefore much low-hanging fruit to be plucked. The question is which fruit is ripening and which is spoiling and when is it at its ripest? I'd be remissed not to point out that If Don really knows what these companies/entities are going to do, in advance, he could leverage that info into X amount of dollars, if it's timed correctly... I'm talking big, big $$'s with lots of zero's, thats how much potential this info could be worth if true verbatim and acted on properly, could actually be done on relatively low-risk too... I know Don doesn't like Alan Moore, for obvious reasons, or Watchmen but I'd say he could effectively pulverize the markets the same way that Dr. Manhattan was depicted in Vietnam..Perhaps if he tried to do this, the powers that be would seek to manipulate the opposite to happen, the thing is you can hedge such moves to make $$ either way, thru different avenues, one of which is buying/selling options..I haven't been able to read thru all the threads on this board, yet, I've seen enough to make this though. There's quite a few companies that could be classified as veiled monopolies on the 'free market'. Which is invaluable information in the right hands.. Don has said Queen Elizabeth owns some media companies in other peoples names, things of that nature are what I mean by veiled monopolies.An obvious example would be Disney, which has thoroughly out-paced the market and tripled in value since late 2011. Another could be Smith and Wesson which is up almost 1000% over a 5 year span. If some horrific news stories are planned false-flag events, as I've read here, they certainly invoke fear, which for many invokes the need to buy more guns.If you really know when horrific events are going to happen ahead of time you could trade the VIX which is a volatility index for massive profits, there was just a 25% spike the other day with this vote on England leaving the EU..Sectors/Industries such as Media, Retail, Pharmaceuticals, Technology, Consumer Goods and Conglomerates.. the list of candidates is in the 1000's probably.. Simply put, is this info 'Actionable Information'?? I could flood this thread with company logo's that are 'hinty', but not all of them are going to go up, certainly thats not how this works. Obviously the cycle of winners and losers would be manipulated in such a way to make it seem like standard 'healthy' corrections.. the question is more about those companies with upcoming catalysts for booming business/usurping market-share, and which of these companies are more indispensable to the deception on a long-term outlook, I'd say media companies are at the top of the list...