prescott

James: Thank you for posting this article. I was wondering why my total coins were not staking. Hopefully, they will now all be able to participate. Thank you, Prescott

I am trying to get this to work. Sorry for all of the posts. : O

This service is still not working. I am going to give up for a while. See y'all in a bit.

I have gotten somewhere. BRB I will be AFK for like 20 minutes.

I am retarded. The camera was unplugged.

I am trying my hardest to get this service to work.

This is good. What language do you speak?

Ok. Thank you for taking the time to reassure me that nothing was broken.

Alright, I will tone it down. But, I am still concerned about how this works. It seems every other voter shows a balance and magnitude equivalent to their vote. Why is it just this one that does not show

Is there a problem with gridcoinstats.eu? What am I not getting here? The CPID you linked does not have enough coins or magnitude to explain 3.4 million share votes. Every other vote seems valid besides

I agree with you on that point about potentially changing the whitelist conditions. The poll is still not back on that yet though. It will expire January 30th. The idea behind it not being considered

Here is the link to the post. I think I have all the necessary items.

Ok. Thanks!

The highest four? So 24, 25, 26, and 27?

Thank you for your contribution. As much I have defended Moo! Wrapper, I only want a knowledge producing ecosystem. Anything other than that would be un-useful.

I was wondering why they were not included.

Sounds like it would be functional. This might also help with integration of other Distributed Network Communities (DNC) into Gridcoin. I envisage Gridcoin being the base for credit (computational power

Ok.

Is there a way to add a "write your own response" choice for polls? Of course the creator would pay the data transmission fee.

I have to agree on that point. Maybe we could keep it until we find a muti-tiered system for allocating Gridcoin Rewards?