I had no issues with how it was being conducted before they began citing the science of gender fluidity to upend everything.

You can be falsely accused whether or not that "woman-man" goes into the washroom or not.

While true, under the old system that assertion would be less likely as I wouldn't be in the same area with exposed genitals. It is a matter of being able to foresee and limit the likelihood of such. An example of this was a couple years ago called the Pence rule, where he stated he wouldn't be alone in a room with a female and the door closed. I always thought that was just good sense, well before he was given credit for it.

Not sure why obvious women (or men) feel oppressed using the same restroom that others of obvious gender attributes are using, and why that takes precedence over the comfortableness/risk to those outnumbering them.