That they reduced the voting limit to make everyone rush to vote?

This one always gets me. Why do so many think their vote on anothers work should offer them a maximum return? Greed. I log on and most of my votes are given hours after the post was written. I don't find that mindset conducive to a healthy community. Sad so many talk it up while their actions show different.

I wasn't a fan of the 50/50, and it amazes me how many were against it yet when it comes to their curation actions they always seek the maximum return as their primary motive, not rewarding the author.

As for the leading sentence of this post, it should read something like this:

Somebody PLEASE give me ANY evidence that mepatriot has done anything good for Steeemt.

Dude has been milking this place since he got here. People want to judge the shifting rewards, judge the whales etc while refusing to see none of that would have mattered/nor shifted probably, if greed like this guy displays wasn't so common. Dude literally pumps out the Family Protection posts feigning outrage, yet last time I checked he never once contributed any of his earnings into the project/community.