If we want Steem to not be SteemIt, we have to have funds and resources.

If Steem is such an awesome chain, why do we have to offer subsidizing start ups? Seems that this is just one of many methods being introduced to squeeze more from the masses for those at the top.

It's their game, but thinking here as with all things here, the same high stakeholders who will benefit from the proposed curation changes will also be quick to vote for free funding for their and their buddies projects. If the projects succeed, it is theirs 100% to do with. They could move it to another chain, or they could decide to squander it playing guitar and partying.

The question will be if after these changes come (they will come), if the price of Steem will have enough valuation to achieve the squeeze they need (for now).