It's not censorship. Post all you want. You're just not entitled to get paid for it if stakeholders vote not to pay you.
¡WTF! @smooth. You keep mentioning the word "stakeholders" as if we all here were equal stakeholders with the same access privileges and with a similar capacity & influence to furtively slide our hands into the communal wealth of the platform to raping and ransack the collective rewards pool in the same proportion and greed as your freaking whimsical lineage. No it's not, son. And each early Ninja Miner knows exactly why.
It's pretty simple really. If you want to remove stakeholder votes from rewards, then remove stakeholders as the ones paying the rewards from inflation.
Paying the rewards from inflation?
Pffft! neither you nor me nor anyone else here "pays" a freaking damn from inflation.
Stakeholders here simply have access to distribute and redistribute the daily wealth of the collective rewards pool whose wealth happens to come from inflation. Which is no the same as paying. And again, neither with the same access privileges nor in the same proportion either.
While the majority here approach the rewards pool with a cup, a jug, a bucket or a barrel to fill them and distribute the rewards among the people. You feel entitled to always approach it with a 'tanker truck' and fill it to the brim.
But you don't fill it with the intention of distributing the rewards among regular people. Since you don't upvote for anyone except your cronies of the ninja mining brotherhood exclusively. Rather, you fill the tanker truck by sucking up and subtracting it from the rewards that others have already distributed to regular people. And so redistribute the wealth again only among your cronies of your ninja mining fraternity in a more sneaky and disgusting way. Right?
And going back to the quote from what you said above...
Why not remove stakeholders from "curation" rewards instead? ¿Huh?
So, to conclude this segment of my reply I'm just going to leave you with what @nealmcspadden said:
So stakeholders are paying inflation that they have not earned or received yet, but post author and voter rewards aren't theirs until the receive them?
And last but not least as for your previous comment that originates this reply.
If it is something else, than what you're saying doesn't even make sense.
It is evident that you will never make sense of whatever I say while you insist in continue to be locked up observing things exclusively from the very limited perspective offered by your comfortable bubble and echo chamber of the brotherhood of ninja miners with their early stake ill-gotten.
Yeah! go ahead and rather remove stakeholders from "curation" rewards instead!! };)
RE: After dedicating 5.5 years to Hive/Steem, I've been informed by KING ACIDYO that I added no value