From the technical point of view, I don't know how it works. However, I know how destructive the actual voting system, trend. Basically, more worthy to follow a trail or delegate HP to the few big one.
The common sense part mostly meant about what for you spend DHF money in case of a start-up. (not for rally car or holiday) I don't want a bigger say. Nothing was about that. I bought coins 1+ year ago, and already sold when I've found out how this 'system' works. Obviously, nobody will spend $100s of thousands, when they see how it works. I don't see paradox in it, only rational conclusion.
Network don't have to agree with me. I am happy to see any progressive moves towards the above, however atm I don't see any.
Since I still stuck in few 'amazing' games here (what could be another topic), I usually check on 1st and 15th of the month, as probably more active days, what is really going on.
Check few 'projects', which are scking DHF money + few devs, big holders (many of them unstaking since weeks+)
So, I don't afraid, I will miss the miracle.
And just saying the obvious, someone simply doesn't do his/her job, just take money.
1 single question:
Who and why allows, keeps proposal upvote without any result in valueplan, leofinance, for example? Why don't they have to make REAL financial reports, what for they spend that money - even if all writes it in proposals, they will do that, even more, report the progressive effect on Hive? (What causing sell pressure, so no1 most of that money should be spent on onboarding, ads, real marketing, to create more DAU, ergo raise the overall value.)
Why everybody ignore this question? Asked at least dozen times from witnesses, big holders, who wrote about it.
Same how they ignore the question: Why don't they sack out those people who simply doesn't deliver any result in valueplan?
These questions are the ironic...😉
RE: Local Lows for Hive Morale