It's not unfair in the least because if you want to earn more you simply buy more. It's actually a very sound economic idea and one that is likely to have better staying power than upvoting high quality content (whatever that is) regardless of investment. Most of the users that win the content lottery are likely to be sellers. Showing a direct link between steem purchases and income increases is a much better approach, economically.
RE: Response to Pharesim's Downvote Propaganda.