Voting late would also help.

I completely agree. Perhaps we should get this message on trending. I think if every bidbot had a slight cost to use it, then we could strike a balance of promotion and content. It was a great feature,

If there was a way for people to use bidbots without it ever being directly profitable to do so, that would be the ideal scenario.

Bingo. In your opinion do the currrent top witnesses and the Steemit,Inc team understand economics enough to make this thing successful? I had thought they did but the changes they pushed from HF 21 (mainly

Do we really want to attract users who The answer to that is always "yes!"

My question to you is: What economic model have you used/consulted that proved to you that it is better to "spread the wealth" in terms of votes vs. say people getting rewarded based on their

Wait, I am confused, are we supposed to be targeting quality content or who people vote for?! I am seeing some incongruencies already here.

And how many have a vote big enough, less than .01% of the entire platform? Technically you are correct and those people have no excuse for not voting small accounts/new users, however, that is not the

And this sounds like the kind of environment that will attract new users..... (Sarcasm font on)

While I agree, I don't think expecting a community of humans to be altruistic (above profit oriented) in order for the community to survive for any length of time is a sustainable model.

The curve being sublinear up to 20 steem is a huge disincentive to ever vote for new/small users. No one wants to 'waste' votes that yield almost half of what they could if used on something expected to

He may not know the whole story, or he is looking at TV too much :)

Very famous crossing section, maybe the world most famous :)

No problem it is cheetah bug, it is happen a lot.

Definitely something to look at. It reminds me when I spend some time in Myanmar jungle with army.