RE: RE: A serious attempt at repairing the STEEM Economic Improvement Proposal (eip) for HF21
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: A serious attempt at repairing the STEEM Economic Improvement Proposal (eip) for HF21

pibara(67)
Published in
#hf21
Words
216
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
7y

Currently, I only have a 2 week run results in an arangodb instance, maybe I'll try putting part of the result into a blog post later.

Let me give a few example with the buckets.

Example 1:
Lets say a post gets 1000 RSHAREs in upvotes and no downvotes under the current system. The author would get about 750 RSHARES and the curators about 250 RSHARES.

Example 2:
If next to the up votes, the post also gets 500 RSHAREs worth of down votes, the author would get about 375 RSHAREs and the curators 125 RSHAREs

Example 3:
If we look at scenario 1 and see what happens in our bucket version of the EIP, the total RSHAREs would be 25% higher for the same voter VESTS, the author would get 833 RSHAREs (2/3) and the curators 417 (1/3)

Example 4:
If we look at scenario 2 and look what happens in our bucket version of the EIP, we get 833 positive RSHARES (2/3) and 208 negative RSHARES (1/3) in the author bucket and we get 417 (1/3) positive against 417 negative RSHAREs (2/3) in he curator bucket. This means the author gets 625 RSHARES while the curators get zero.

Hope the buckets concept make sense like this.

What are your thoughts on the nS^Log(n) curves?

@pibara: Currently, I | Ecency