He has the patent trail that proves criminal conspiracy. Without him, there is no evidence of the crimes committed from a person with any credibility to speak on patent as an expert.

Who is saying he is controlled opposition and where is your source for that?

I have listened to 20 + hours of David's opinion and did not reach the same conclusion when he shared his interest in participating in the Nuremberg 2 trials.

The video you are not seeing because you use a broken front end,
https://lbry.tv/@thenewamericanvideo:7/211203_CTM_DavidMartin_Export1:4