a short line about you concurring with someone else would be great as it conveys the concern without much work on your part. It's a reality of stakeweighted dpos that you have asymetric considerations of accounts expressing concerns.

Just because someone doesn't have a big stake, their concerns aren't less valid. Just shows how you are used to backroom deals and using your stake to blackmail and bribe.
I followed the public discussion, and wasn't satisfied by the replies. That's your fault

you can vote the proposal. others can downvote posts or alter witness votes.

And that you conflate the different types of votes, and think using one to enforce another, doesn't make you look good either.

Maybe you should just be quiet and meditate a bit.