The situation could be a lot better if people would read the whitepaper of a project before they invest into it. Or understand why stuff is named the way it is (content/curation rewards...).
If someone's expectations aren't met they either didn't research even the basics, or the system fails to work as intended. I prefer when the former group leaves.

Calling those who care about the idea behind steem "newSteem commando" is hilarious. There's lots of projects that had a high APR in their whitepaper, it's never been the idea of steem.