However, it has also been done here in the past and happening now. Is that right? No. I try to learn from past mistakes. Should there be “retaliation”? No. Of course not. But as you said people can choose.

Sure you did. Instead of staying on topic, you invent some requirement for witnesses to break down cost.

Great, just ignore my questions. Blocked here too, you're insufferable.

For sure the DHF should NOT be used to prop up failing ventures (like the banks were) but that didn’t appear to be what was proposed. It's excatly that. The old management created a hole in their books,

I have gone to banks and applied for loans in the past. I am aware how documents requirements are. So why do you think less would be okay here? And why do you think it's okay to retaliate when the application

So because other whales vote for bad proposals, I should too now? The only reason you think it would be about aggy is because he said so. I didn't even know he's still involved before he started his vendetta

Sure. I'm available on discord any time.

However, many of the successful proposals also lack detail, so it seems unfair to pick on this one alone. I don't pick. There are many active proposals I do not vote for. None of them attacked me personally

I agree. Looks like another nothing-burger to me.

I have been trying to reach out to senior Hivers in a professional way for over 6 months and have repeatedly been ignored or just been told that my ideas don't count cos i only have 70hp. And in my view,

Huh? You miss a lot of context it seems. Where did I go against any community?

It is true that they are responsible for a lot of transactions on hive. But do those really benefit the whole ecosystem? They use 2nd layer tokens issues by themselves, fees go to hive engine. They're

Thanks for the constructive and honest talk. Glad we could clear up some old issues and can remove the personal factor from the equation now. Votes should be used for the good of the chain and nothing

I didn't have a problem with him before this. I did tell you that I do not condone the backroom deals you're also involved with, but I kept quiet. Until I was attacked personally.

For now, please focus on next week and get better as soon as possible. This isn't worth the stress, you have people who depend on you in much more profound ways. Sorry for wishing you ill, that was not

This isn't about you or Matt being busy, it's about aggy blackmailing, bribing and bullying. Well, and you defending him, which felt like a kick to the stomach. If the combined net support gets higher

This should've been part of the original proposal. Or added as soon as people asked for it. I don't mind asking for votes. I do mind putting others down who don't vote the way you want. Speaking of

So how is it both sides then? Their proposal was lacking, and instead of correcting it in a timely manner they went around bullying and bribing.

a short line about you concurring with someone else would be great as it conveys the concern without much work on your part. It's a reality of stakeweighted dpos that you have asymetric considerations

A plan for the funding have been published One hour ago. A little late, don't you agree? You told me this would be the consequences of my actions. If you're okay with voting according to my values having