RE: RE: Downvotes & Reward Policing: Abuse of Power or Good for the Platform?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Downvotes & Reward Policing: Abuse of Power or Good for the Platform?

Words
161
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
5y

(2) a voting system that leverages the 'wisdom of the crowd.'

If you've ever powered down HP earned from posting rewards, please don't put the responsibility for distribution issues on anyone else.

Now the way Hive is currently designed, it's not ideal to keep HP distributed and thus keep more crowd-wisdom rather than whale-wisdom. If earned HP had a longer power down time, but still had all the same influence, we'd see something closer to ideal. This can be accomplished with one balance for powered-up (bought) HP, plus legacy/current HP, and once implemented, a second balance for earned HP from that point on. The separate balances would be summed for influence purposes, so you wouldn't notice much change, but would have drastically different power down schedules. Short for the powered-up/legacy HP and a year or two (as the original Steem design worked) for earned HP. If you want to see more crowd-wisdom on Hive, support this idea and spread it around.

@pfunk: (2) a voting | Ecency