Today I had a long comment conversation with an Power curator who had down-voted a week's worth of my postings regarding Vote trading.
Refer to the reply comments between him and I
Organize my thoughts
I was aware of the Hive system advising not to do vote trading as recommendation. The down voting system was implemented to control abusers who pursue profit maximization.
What if Vote trading was allowed on the condition that you curate 50% of your power? If that is not possible, it would be better to officially ban Vote trading.
This effective curator seems to be convinced that every vote traders do not curate at all and create a sense of incongruity in social networks by maximizing profits. Is that true?
Allowance of vote trading as condition of 50% curation of HIVE power does still undermine the value of the system?
There is no 100% perfect system in this world.
