♦♦ Is there a time of idolatry between the 'adult' men and 'married' men in India for three years? The question can be raised by a Supreme Court ruling. Under the law of this country, age 18 and up to both boys and girls
But there is a conscious gap of three years between both of them in the case of a vulnerable age. Only 18 girls and 21 men are married. According to the law, the Kerala High Court had declared the marriage of Thushara and Nandkumar, 20 years old Kerala, as canceled by their verdict. Because the bride does not cross the age of 18, even if the groom does not cross the scheduled marriage age, 21. Consequently, the High Court entrusts Thushara's responsibility to his father, not under the control of a minor husband. But the Supreme Court has handed over the right to decide on the decision that the Kerala High Court decides to abstain with the judgment of Thushara Kahra. And said that their marriage is not legal, but they have the right to leave-in relationship.
That is to say, attaining adult status is not the end of marriage, it is not marriageable. The question arises, why is the man's marriageable age, or why he will be tied in 21? There may be some physiological reasons behind keeping the age of girls and boys different in the marriage, but the contribution of patriarchal mentality is much more. This mentality says that the husband, in spite of his wife, should actually have something to head from the age side of the family. Asserted, the main earning male in the family. Therefore, only after being established in the field of living, his family should take responsibility.
That is the difference between those three years. But the era has changed. Men still earn money in the majority family, but as a policy, the right to earn and the responsibility of the person is only a man-that concept is now completely complete. So there is no logic for the man to keep the marriage age more than the law.
But change the law, society will accept it? In many cases what has been recognized by the law, the society has taken many times to accept it. Since 2010, the Supreme Court has given several historic verdicts for taking leave-in relation. For example, if a woman and a man reside together as a husband and wife, even if they are not bound in a marriage, they will have to be legally married, and after the death of their partner, the other person will also get the rights of his property. And the verdict is also given as to whether their children will get legal recognition.
But still in the society, unmarried couples can not find a suitable place to live in the city's chest, often the quarrels of the neighbors and the police harassment often leave them without company. Therefore, even though the recognition of the court did not prevent the society. There will be more waiting for him.
