I'm still working to move the keys for those accounts to a multisig quorum for control of @sports-gov which controls @hive-101690 and @sportsnft. @sportstalksocial was removed from community control to serve as an announcements portal for the sportstalksocial.com website and to do community content. https://www.sportstalksocial.com/@patrickulrich/sports-governance-proposal-sports-account-and-distribution-changes I guess you could say I'm still owner at this point based on those points but the goal will be to make sure I am not as soon as I can be confident that the accounts won't be locked in the multisig. I should have already completed that but just haven't got the chance.

https://github.com/hive-engine/outpost is the repository for the outpost sites. As for BTC I would assume that's funds from a-ads.com and probably comingled funds they use. They had automated payouts into the SWAP.BTC address for the funds that are in sports-gov.

Actifit gave us a much larger token distribution for the first few years than we would have achieved on our own. That creates its own issues as you point out but if those users don't want change then forcing it on them isn't the solution either. I'm just speaking from experience when it comes to limiting partnerships with Actifit that stakeholders were not for it when I've opened discussion in the past. Maybe they would see things differently now.

If stakeholders voted a proposal that said to wipe away everything and just have a core team with the rights to influence however they liked then I would think that's fair game to do. I'd be happy to transfer the domain sportstalksocial.com to that team as well if the community wanted someone else to control the project's host domain name. I think if the community votes for it then that's what we should do.